Recent Content
Serial Lite IV - Rx Simulation Issues
Hello, I'm having trouble with the RX in side when simulating the F-Tile Serial Lite IV example design. Enviroment: - Quartus Prime Pro Edition 26.1, Windows - Questa Altera FPGA Edition-64 2025.3, installed with Quartus 26.1, with its precompiled device libraries - Device AGMF039R47A1E1VC (Agilex 7 M-Series) - F-Tile Serial Lite IV IP: FGT, NRZ, 8 lanes, 18.0048 Gbps, RS-FEC enabled, FULL streaming mode, PMA reference clock 180.048 MHz, System PLL 562.65 MHz - Example design generated from the IP parameter editor (Generate Example Design). Problem 1 : the generated run_mentor.tcl cannot compile the device libraries. run_mentor.tcl sets QUARTUS_SIM_LIB_DIR to $QUARTUS_ROOTDIR/eda/sim_lib2, DEVICES_SIM_LIB_DIR to $QUARTUS_ROOTDIR/../devices/sim_lib2 and ENABLE_QE_LIBRARY_COMPILATION to true. Both folders exist, but dev_com fails with vlog-7 (Failed to open design unit file) on the first file of every device library : quartus/eda/sim_lib2 : 220model.v, sgate.v, altera_primitives.v, altera_mf.v, altera_lnsim.sv, tennm_atoms.sv, tennm_hssi_atoms.sv, ctfb_hssi_atoms.sv, ctr_hssi_atoms.sv devices/sim_lib2 : tennm_fm_hps.sv, tennm_fp8_noc.sv, tennm_revb_io96.sv, tennm_revb_io96_iopll.sv ,ctfb_hssi_atoms_ncrypt.sv and ctfb_hssi_atoms2_ncrypt.sv, which the script also compiles, are not present anywhere in the installation. The only ctfb_hssi_atoms file installed is questa_fe/intel/verilog/src/ctfb_hssi_atoms.sv. Problem 2 : with the precompiled libraries the rx never comes up To get past problem 1, the two sim_lib2 lines were removed from run_mentor.tcl and ENABLE_QE_LIBRARY_COMPILATION was set to false, so the design binds to the precompiled Questa Altera FPGA Edition libraries. The macros in USER_DEFINED_VERILOG_COMPILE_OPTIONS were left as generated. Compilation and elaboration then succeed, and : - Phy TX Lanes Stable and Phy EHIP ready assert at 58,215 ns, TX link_up at 58,223 ns. - rx_pcs_fec_phy_reset_n is released at about 200 ns together with the TX, and rx_reset_ack asserts during the reset and clears after the release. - rx_cdr_lock stays 0 on all 8 lanes and rx_link_up never asserts : the testbench stays at "Waiting for RX Link Up". The run was stopped at 126.5 us, 68 us after TX link up. The reference logs in UG-20325 show RX link up 20 to 28 us after TX link up. - The F-tile model reports a single lane state change per lane, "State change from S0, R0, W0 TO S2, R0, W0", finished at 3,625 ns, and nothing after that. - The simulation runs at about 5 hours of wall-clock time for 126.5 us. Our own design, which uses the same IP, behaves identically on this installation. Questions 1. Where should the files that run_mentor.tcl expects in quartus/eda/sim_lib2 and devices/sim_lib2 come from ? Is an installation component missing ? 2. Is the example design supported with the precompiled Questa Altera FPGA Edition libraries ? If so, what does the FGT RX need to reach rx_cdr_lock ? 3. Is this a known issue in 26.1, and is there a patch or a workaround ?3Views0likes1CommentNAND flash issue with dual-core ARM® Cortex®-A9
The 5CSEBA2U19I7SN SoC HPS NAND pins are connected to a 4Gb NAND flash memory chip (S34ML04G200TFI003). In this design, the active-low Write Protect pin (#WP) is connected to both a 10kΩ pull-up resistor (to 3.3V) and a 10kΩ pull-down resistor (to Ground). During booting or flashing, a few NAND flash chips do not work properly, and a few nand flashes have been permanently damaged. Is connecting the #WP pin to both a pull-up and a pull-down resistor a correct hardware approach for cyclone SOC HPS NAND configuration? Best Regards, Keshav152Views0likes3CommentsNIOS-V-64bit - why no double precision FPU ?
We need the 64 bit NIOS for several projects and must have a double precision FPU option. But the documentation so far lists only a single precision FPU Is this correct ? a 64 bit processor not having a (64 bit) double precision native FPU option seems unbeleiveable . It is about as strange as say, not having an 64 bit ALU. Altera- please explain ? page 3 : https://docs.altera.com/v/u/docs/759484/nios-v-processors-for-agilextm-5-fpgas-e-series-technology-brief Or please add this to the basic feature provision ? With thanks Glen. (Experienced Xilinx user consideriing migrating-defecting to Altera )Solved115Views0likes4CommentsDual Port Nios V BSP error
I've created a Nios V qsys with dual port onchip memory in Quartus Pro 26.1 True dual port, first port connected to instruction manager, second - to data manager. Base addresses automatically assigned the same to both. But i'am unable to create the BSP due to memory regions overlapping error! Of course the addresses are same - its the same physical onchip memory! Any solytion, please? Regards, Vlad.197Views0likes5CommentsDoes anyone actually use the FPGA AI Suite?
Hello Altera Community My question today is: does anyone actually use the ai suite, and is able to profit from it? I am thinking of vibe coding a micro service with the docker image, such that one can try the compiler and have the output presented nicely. That way they dont have to read the entire manual to try it out. However it does not make sense for me to make it, if nobody will use it. I only know 3 people who have used it, myself, fpga zealot, and one guy on linkedin. Thanks in advance.84Views0likes3CommentsMT25QL128 Not Available in ALTASMI_PARALLEL Configuration Device List
Hi everyone, I'm working on a design with Cyclone FPGA(s) in a master/slave (active/passive) configuration, using a Micron MT25QL128 flash device for FPGA configuration storage. While trying to instantiate the ALTASMI_PARALLEL IP, I noticed that the configuration device list only contains devices such as: EPCS16/64/128 EPCQ16/32/64/128/256/512 I cannot find MT25QL128 in the list. I have the following questions: What is the recommended configuration device selection in ALTASMI_PARALLEL when using a Micron MT25QL128? Is selecting EPCQ128 the correct approach since both devices are 128 Mbit? Are there any known compatibility issues between ALTASMI_PARALLEL and MT25QL128 regarding Read ID, status register access, sector erase, or page programming? When converting a SOF to a JIC file in Quartus, i can see in that list as configuration device for an MT25QL128 flash. For reference: FPGA family: Cyclone IV E Flash device: Micron MT25QL128 Configuration method: Active Serial Application: Master/Slave FPGA system with configuration stored in external flash Any guidance or experience with this setup would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!205Views0likes7CommentsThe DC_FIFO issue of Cyclone 10 GX devices
Hello Guys, We are using 10CX220F780 and 10CX105F780 devices now. They are communicating thru XCVR. So one DC_FIFO is realized between RX received data and user logic fabric. This DC FIFO operation always has problem during the first operating. But it will be normal during the second operating. As the above image indicates, RX get data from XCVR and put them to FIFO. The write is ok, however, the reading has problem. Because the first read data is ZERO, this causes the following reads all halt. I apply one more same operation, now it's ok, as following image: As above image indicates, one data is put into FIFO, and it will be read out from this FIFO in time. But why always the first time operating is not correct after power-up or re-configuring FPGA? I did one test: FIFO's Rdreq is fix to high level. Then I got the following result: As above image indicates, the first data x"40000000" can't be written into FIFO. So I always got ZERO for the first data. Buy how this can happen? I kept detecting more deeply, as following image As above image indicates, after Wreq valid, 2 clock cycles later, Usedw will change, and 2 more clock cycles later, empty signal will be changed to low level. This is the problem. Usedw and empty signals are changed too fast. I checked normal timing, UsedW should be changed 3 clock cycles later after Wreq valid, and empty should be changed 5 clock cycles later after Wreq valid. Why can this happen? And always happen one time after power-up. Best Regard644Views0likes6CommentsThere are distinct scratches on the BGA substrate, extending beneath the solder balls.
I would like to ask a question. There is an issue with this BGA product, model number EP4CE30F23C8N: there are scratches on the bottom substrate that have penetrated the solder balls. Could this be a quality issue? I would be grateful if you could provide a reply. Many thanks! I have attached the image,Thank you.528Views0likes5CommentsAbout EPCQ-L device
Hello, I would like to use the EPCQ-L1024 for the configuration of the 10CX220YF780E5G. However, it appears that the EPCQ-L1024 has been discontinued. Is there a device that can be connected directly to the 10CX220YF780E5G and used in the same way as the EPCQ-L1024? Thank you160Views0likes7CommentsRegarding the SDM Random Number Generator in Agilex 5 E-Series
Hi, Altera support team, <Overview> I have some questions about SDM Random Number Generator. But I cannot find any detailed information on that. I think it isn't public information. Could you answer below my questions? <Questions> 1. What is the entropy source? 2. How many bits of entropy are configurated? 3. Is the Random Number Generator configured as a combination of TRNG and DRBG? 4. Is it possible to provide documentation containing detailed information? <Note> We received these questions from a specific customer. So if possible, could you open a private session? BR, Wacky.14Views0likes1Comment
Featured Places
Community Resources
Check out the support articles on personalizing your community account, contributing to the community, and providing community feedback directly to the admin team!Tags
- troubleshooting10,391 Topics
- fpga dev tools quartus® prime software pro4,342 Topics
- FPGA Dev Tools Quartus II Software3,131 Topics
- stratix® 10 fpgas and socs1,548 Topics
- agilex® 7 fpgas and socs1,535 Topics
- arria® 10 fpgas and socs1,379 Topics
- stratix® v fpgas1,314 Topics
- arria® v fpgas and socs1,228 Topics
- Configuration1,082 Topics
- cyclone® v fpgas and socs1,057 Topics
Recent Blogs
PACKET CLASSIFICATION | FPGA | NETWORKING + SECURITY Every packet decision starts with classification. Routers, firewalls, SmartNICs, security gateways, and service-edge platforms must determine which policy applies before traffic can be forwarded, blocked, inspected, redirected, or prioritized. TCAM earned its place in these systems because it provides predictable lookup behavior and native ternary matching for ACL and LPM workloads. But as policy databases grow, search keys widen, and rules change more frequently, the traditional approach of scaling specialized ternary memory creates tougher tradeoffs in capacity, power, resource utilization, and system integration. Altera Stellar solutions takes a different approach. Instead of scaling packet classification by building ever-larger ternary-memory structures, Stellar turns classification into an optimized search problem that runs on configurable FPGA resources. The result is an FPGA-native path for large, dynamic packet-classification tables without giving up the policy semantics that made TCAM useful in the first place. TCAM scales through memory expansion. Stellar scales through search intelligence. Keep the TCAM semantics. Change the scaling model. Stellar preserves the intent of ACL, LPM, and multi-field classification, but changes how those rules are represented and searched. The Stellar Software Stack organizes policies into optimized graph structures, partitions the rule database, and continuously manages those search structures as the database evolves. The hardware then executes the search using configurable FPGA search engines while rule information is stored in conventional memory resources. Depending on the configuration, Stellar can use on-chip M20K memory, eSRAM, DDR, or HBM. That gives architects more freedom to balance throughput, capacity, latency, power, and FPGA resource use around the needs of the actual system. Use dense memory where it makes sense, and intelligence where it matters A traditional TCAM combines storage and comparison circuitry inside specialized ternary-memory arrays. That architecture delivers deterministic matching, but scaling the table means scaling the specialized comparison structure as well. Stellar separates rule storage from search execution. Ternary information can be represented as value-and-mask data in conventional memory, while graph organization and software-managed optimization direct each search toward the relevant parts of the database. As tables grow from thousands of entries toward hundreds of thousands or millions, this creates a different path for scaling capacity and power. The white paper goes deeper into why this matters, including the tradeoffs between TCAM and Stellar, the role of memory hierarchy, and a set of Stellar configurations spanning different key widths, capacities, memory resources, and projected five-tuple performance. Bring classification into the programmable datapath The value is bigger than the lookup engine itself. Stellar is designed to operate inside the FPGA alongside packet parsing, telemetry, encryption, traffic management, host-interface logic, and customer packet-processing RTL. For system architects, that means classification can become part of the same programmable platform already handling the datapath. A firewall can pair large, dynamic ACL processing with the rest of its traffic pipeline. A router can combine LPM and policy enforcement with programmable networking functions. A SmartNIC can integrate flow classification with offload and customer-specific acceleration. That system-level flexibility is especially relevant for 100GE to 400GE designs where classification must scale without consuming the platform that surrounds it. Read the full whitepaper! The full Altera white paper, Altera TCAM Alternative Solutions Scale Packet Classification to Millions of Rules for Networking Equipment, explains the architecture behind Stellar and the design choices that make it different. It covers TCAM fundamentals and scaling limits, Stellar graph-based search and software partitioning, memory-hierarchy options, configuration examples, quantitative architectural comparisons, dynamic updates, and deployment use cases across networking and security. Read the white paper See how Stellar uses search intelligence, configurable FPGA resources, and a flexible memory hierarchy to create a scalable alternative for large ACL and LPM workloads.
1 day ago0likes
4 MIN READ
September 28, 2026 The next generation of embedded systems will not be defined by compute alone. It will depend on how quickly, reliably, and intelligently systems can move data from the physical world into AI engines and turn insights back into action. That message came through clearly at Embedded World North America 2026, held September 22–24 at the Anaheim Convention Center. For Altera, the show provided an opportunity to highlight a growing collaboration with NVIDIA and demonstrate the role of FPGAs in high-performance edge AI architectures. Connecting sensors to AI with flexibility and determinism At the center of the story was NVIDIA Holoscan Sensor Bridge technology. The solution creates a high-bandwidth, low-latency path between real-world sensors and GPU-based AI processing, an increasingly important capability for robotics, industrial automation, intelligent video, medical systems, and other physical AI applications. FPGAs are well suited to this role because they can provide deterministic processing, flexible I/O, and protocol adaptation close to the sensor. Rather than forcing every application into the same hardware configuration, FPGA-based designs can be tailored to performance, connectivity, and latency requirements of a specific system. In the show’s keynote, NVIDIA Vice President Deepu Talla described the value of this flexibility: “You can select any of the Altera FPGAs depending on the application and pair them with any of the NVIDIA frameworks.” Altera’s post noted that Altera offers Holoscan Sensor Bridge solutions spanning 10G to 100G, where 25G and 100G offer significantly more bandwidth compared to other Holoscan ecosystem partners, helping developers scale connectivity for demanding edge workloads. The result is a practical sensor-to-compute architecture: Altera FPGAs handle the flexible, deterministic front end, while NVIDIA platforms provide the accelerated environment for AI and robotics workloads. An ecosystem approach to accelerating development The demonstrations also underscored that successful edge AI deployments require more than individual components. Developers need reference designs, production-ready boards, and partners that help bridge the gap between evaluation and deployment. Altera’s growing Holoscan ecosystem includes more than 10 reference designs and partner boards. These building blocks can help teams reduce integration effort and move faster from proof of concept to a real-time AI product. One example was on display at Altera partner Critical Link’s booth. Critical Link was recognized as a Best in Show Award winner in the AI & Machine Learning category at the show. Visitors to the booth could see a live demonstration of a 5-camera Holoscan Sensor Bridge solution, using Critical Link’s MitySOM-A5E as the featured Agilex® 5 FPGA hardware platform. The demonstration showed how an Agilex 5 FPGA-based system can help bring sensor data into an NVIDIA-powered AI pipeline while preserving the low-latency, high-bandwidth behavior required by edge applications. From 10G to 100G: Building the data plane for edge AI Altera’s Holoscan Sensor Bridge solutions are designed to make the sensor-to-GPU path faster and more adaptable. A recent Altera technical blog describes 10G, 25G, and 100G reference designs, including a 25G design on Agilex 5 SoC FPGAs for multi-camera sensor data flow and accelerated processing at the edge. In this architecture, the FPGA serves as the data plane: connecting to diverse sensors, aggregating streams, adapting protocols, and preprocessing data before it reaches the NVIDIA GPU. That division of labor helps reduce data-movement bottlenecks while preserving deterministic timing and giving developers room to evolve the system as sensor interfaces and AI workloads change. Altera Technical Holoscan blog for Robotics: Altera Pushes the Boundaries of Edge AI with New Holoscan Sensor Bridge Solutions | Altera Community - 355665 Watch the 25G Holoscan demo video: YouTube/Altera Why the sensor-to-compute path matters As AI moves into physical environments, system designers are balancing several competing requirements: Real-time response: Applications such as robotics and industrial inspection cannot always afford the delay of sending raw sensor data to a remote system. High-bandwidth data movement: Modern sensors generate increasingly rich data streams that must be transported without creating a bottleneck. Deterministic behavior: Safety-critical and industrial systems need predictable timing and consistent performance. Design flexibility: Product teams must support different sensors, interfaces, and deployment conditions without redesigning the entire platform. Faster development: Reference designs and ecosystem partnerships can shorten the path from concept to production. The Altera and NVIDIA approach addresses these needs by combining FPGA-based connectivity and processing with GPU-accelerated AI. It gives developers a modular foundation for building systems that can adapt as sensors, models, and application requirements evolve. Building what comes next at the edge The conversation at Embedded World North America 2026 pointed toward a broader shift in embedded design. Edge systems are becoming intelligent, connected, and increasingly autonomous, but their performance still depends on the data path that feeds them. By pairing Altera FPGAs with NVIDIA platforms and collaborating with partners such as Critical Link, developers gain more options for designing that path. The combination of flexible hardware, high-speed connectivity, and accelerated AI can help transform raw sensor input into timely decisions at the point where data is created. For teams developing the next generation of robotics, industrial automation, intelligent vision, and physical AI systems, this is the opportunity: Build a sensor-to-compute architecture that is fast enough for today’s workloads, flexible enough for tomorrow’s requirements, and ready to scale from demonstration to deployment. Learn more about Altera’s Physical AI-related Solutions: Holoscan: https://www.altera.com/fpga-solutions/sensory-interfaces Robotics: https://www.altera.com/fpga-solutions/robotics-solutions-stack Video: https://www.altera.com/fpga-solutions/video-solutions-stack
1 day ago0likes
1 MIN READ
Altera has begun shipping the new Agilex® 7 M-Series R31G multi-host acceleration package, giving customers a new way to build high-bandwidth systems that connect more hosts while moving more data through the network and memory subsystem. R31G is designed for architectures where data must move quickly between the network, memory, and multiple CPUs, GPUs, or other hosts. By bringing 800G or 2x400G Ethernet together with expanded PCIe 5.0/CXL host connectivity, the package opens new possibilities for AI NICs, storage acceleration, cloud acceleration, and other high-throughput platforms. What R31G enables More network bandwidth: 800G or 2x400G Ethernet capability for high-throughput data paths. More host connectivity: Two PCIe 5.0 x16 host interfaces, or up to four independent PCIe 5.0 x8 connections, with CXL support for flexible multi-host architectures. More memory bandwidth and I/O: DDR5-6400 and LPDDR5-6400 support, up to 204.8 GBps of memory bandwidth, and 768 GPIO in a compact 56 x 45 mm package. The result is a programmable platform that can connect, accelerate, and adapt as infrastructure requirements evolve, while keeping high-speed networking, host connectivity, and memory bandwidth tightly integrated. More network bandwidth. More hosts. More memory bandwidth. One programmable platform. Learn more in the Agilex® 7 M-Series product site.
8 days ago0likes
As AI, cloud, and high-performance computing systems continue to scale, data center operators need more bandwidth within increasingly constrained power and thermal envelopes. Linear Pluggable Optics (LPO) offers an important path forward by simplifying optical modules, reducing power consumption, and lowering latency. LPO places signal-conditioning responsibilities in the host device, allowing the optical module to operate without the DSP used in traditional retimed optics. This architecture can reduce optical module power by 30% to 40%, helping data center designers increase connectivity density while simplifying cooling and thermal management. Altera Brings LPO to the FPGA Market Altera is the first FPGA provider to publicly demonstrate Linear Pluggable Optics interoperability using production FPGA devices. Continued validation with LPO modules from Amphenol and FS further demonstrates the breadth of the emerging ecosystem supported by Altera. Agilex® 7 FPGAs and SoCs bring the power and latency advantages of LPO to programmable platforms used in SmartNICs, data processing units, AI accelerators, and custom infrastructure. The initial public demonstration established that Agilex 7 devices could successfully interoperate with 400G LPO modules. The latest validation advances that milestone by confirming that the implementation meets the performance requirements expected for deployment in demanding data center environments. Validated for Real Deployment Conditions Comprehensive testing confirms that Agilex 7 F-Tile transceivers meet the electrical and link-performance requirements defined by the 100G-DR-LPO specification. The validation demonstrated: Compliance with the required transmit, receive, and link-performance criteria Successful interoperability with LPO modules from Amphenol and FS Successful LPO connectivity across distances from 1 meter to 500 meters Consistent performance across temperature and voltage conditions Measurable performance margin beyond required thresholds Testing covered demanding signal conditions, voltage variation, and temperatures ranging from minus 40 degrees Celsius to 105 degrees Celsius for electrical characterization. Functional link testing included a 1-meter LPO connection, a 100-meter active optical cable, and 500-meter LPO modules from Amphenol and FS. The results demonstrate robust, repeatable operation across multiple module suppliers and link distances, with measurable margin relative to the required performance limits. For customers, this validation provides confidence that Agilex® 7 support for LPO is ready for real-world deployment. Following the industry’s first public FPGA interoperability demonstration, the solution has now been evaluated against LPO performance requirements using modules from multiple suppliers and over link distances up to 500 meters. Together, these results demonstrate a practical foundation for deploying LPO connectivity in next-generation data center systems. More Efficient Connectivity for AI and Cloud Infrastructure The value of LPO grows as data centers deploy more high-speed optical connections. Eliminating the DSP from each optical module can reduce power across thousands of links, simplify optical module design, ease thermal pressure at the front panel, and support lower-latency data movement. Agilex 7 FPGAs add programmability to this more efficient optical architecture. Customers can combine LPO connectivity with packet processing, acceleration, security, telemetry, and evolving protocol support on a single adaptable platform. This flexibility is especially valuable for AI clusters and cloud infrastructure, where workloads, network architectures, and connectivity standards continue to evolve. Validation with multiple module vendors also gives system designers greater flexibility as the LPO supplier ecosystem continues to develop. Ready for the Next Generation of Data Centers The combination of public interoperability and comprehensive validation marks a major step for LPO in the FPGA market. Altera has demonstrated that LPO works with production Agilex 7 devices and validated that the solution meets key LPO requirements with measurable operating margin. This gives customers a proven foundation for evaluating and deploying lower-power, lower-latency optical connectivity in real data center environments. With Agilex® 7 FPGAs, LPO is ready for real-world data center deployment.
1 month ago0likes
Security requirements are entering a new phase. Systems being designed today may remain deployed for many years, while regulatory expectations, cryptographic standards, and threat models continue to evolve. For designs in industrial, communications, infrastructure, aerospace, defense, and embedded applications, long-term security is becoming a core platform requirement. FPGA-based designs allow designs to meet today’s security needs and evolve with tomorrow’s requirements. Altera is now offering Agilex® 3 and Agilex® 5 devices with PQC-enabled secure boot and configuration support, helping customers prepare for the next generation of security requirements. With the Quartus® Prime Pro Edition 26.1.1 release, customers can begin using a PQC flow that works with Agilex 3 and Agilex 5 based hardware. This milestone extends the security architecture already built into the Agilex platform. Agilex devices use the Secure Device Manager as a hardware root of trust for secure configuration and device management. By combining PQC-capable devices with Quartus software enablement, Altera is helping customers strengthen the FPGA chain of trust as post-quantum requirements move from planning to implementation. The value is immediate and practical. Customers can start designing with supported devices today, while using Quartus 26.1.1 to take advantage of the current software flow. This gives teams a path to address emerging compliance and security expectations without needing a future platform redesign. The same hardware foundation also allows for additional security enhancements over time. Customers designing with PQC-capable Agilex 3 and Agilex 5 devices can benefit from planned software and firmware improvements enabled by the underlying hardware, with no further FPGA hardware upgrade required for those enhancements. Agilex 3 devices bring this capability to power- and cost-optimized FPGA and SoC designs used in embedded, edge, industrial, control, and platform-management applications. Agilex 5 devices extend the same security direction into mid-range FPGA and SoC designs that require higher performance, greater integration, and broader system capability. Post-quantum readiness will continue to advance, and Altera is building that evolution into the Agilex platform roadmap. With PQC-capable Agilex 3 and Agilex 5 devices and Quartus 26.1.1 software enablement, customers have a practical starting point today and a scalable foundation for future security enhancements.
1 month ago0likes