Recent Content
Store custom keys on SDM Agilex3
Hi I know it's possible to store encryption and siging keys on the SDM for fpga firmware decryption and authentication, but is it possible to store my own keys on it? I will use the key to decrypt my own software files on the HPS, so I need some way to send the ecrypted software to the SDM then the SDM will use the key to decrypt it and send it back. Is there any documentation or tutorial for this?433Views0likes12CommentsUnable to generate Agilex 5 bitstream with Quartus Prime Pro 25.1.0.129
I am running Quartus Prime Pro version 25.1.0.129 on a fresh Ubuntu 26.04.1 LTS install; I installed Quartus using the "individual files" method (see download page for reference) where I only downloaded device support for Agilex 5 and Agilex common. I was able to successfully run synth+PnR on a trivial design (`assign LED = ~BTN`) for the Terasic DE25-Standard devkit . I used the device code "A5ED013BB32AE4SR1" which I copied verbatim from the `golden_top.qsf` file distributed as part of the DE25-standard resources CD on Terasic's website. However, when running `quartus_asm` I get this error: Critical Warning(18636): Compilation Report contains advance information. Specifications for device A5ED013BB32AE4SR1 are subject to change. Contact Intel for information on availability. No programming file will be generated. I came across this KB article that proposes a fix for this exact problem and supplies a patch that seems to modify the file `$QUARTUS_ROOT/quartus/linux64/quartus.ini` to include some "dev_password" fields; a comment in that file confirms that there is a password for the "A5ED013BB32A_R1 OPN". However, even with this patch applied (I can confirm Quartus is using the correct ini file from the logs which say "Using INI file ..."), I still get the same error. For reasons that are highly specific to my setup it is not easy to upgrade (please just believe me on this one); the KB article mentions 25.1.1 and not 25.1, but the docs also say the same issue is present in 25.1.1. Is the only way to fix this upgrading to 25.1.1 or is there something else that might be wrong? Thanks in advance!Solved9Views0likes5CommentsProper PERST# connection for FMC on Agilex5 Modular Development Kit
I am using an Agilex5 Modular Development Kit to implement a design that has two PCIe endpoints. Each endpoint would run at the same x4 configuration (start with Gen3 and maybe move to Gen4). The first endpoint is easy as the board supports it natively. For the second endpoint I am planning to use the Terrasic P16E-FMCP board and use a separate adapter to limit the width to x4. I went through the schematic several times and I am fairly confident that FMC PCIe lanes 0-3 (plus the reference clock) would connect to the transceiver bank 1B on the Agilex5 device. So the high speed signals look to be OK. My issue is with how to achieve a proper PERST connection. The FMC board connects the PERST# signal to the FMC RES0 pin which is not connected on the Agilex board. This means I have to make a manual connection to the appropriate pins on the FPGA device. Assuming that my bank 1B analysis is correct then the possible PERST# pin connections are: CF132 net A5E_HVIO_5A_6 IO_D61 pin on the primary board-to-board connector Carrier board: net MIPI_XHS0_1V8 which is floating if there is nothing plugged to the MIPI connector Manual PERST connection: Level shift the PERST signal down to 1.8V and then solder it to the MIPI_XHS0_1V8 net. BU109 net A5E_HVIO_5B_6 IO_A56 pin on the primary board-to-board connector Carrier board: BMC_UART_RX0_I2C_SCL_3V3 which is connected to the MAX10 device Manual PERST connection not possible Before I do the board modification, I would like to confirm my analysis is correct (maybe 1B is not the correct bank) and that I am not missing some other, easier, connection. Thank you very much in advance. Any help is greatly appreciated359Views0likes5CommentsSchematics/layout for TerasIC SoCKit rev. D with Cyclone V
Greetings! I am working with an ALTERA/TerasIC SoCKit development board for Cyclone V. I've downloaded the "SoCKit CD-ROM ( rev. D Hardware )" archive from www.terasic.com.tw, but it does not contain schematics or PCB layout files. What I want to do is access ~8 GPIO pins on the board, but it does not have a GPIO header. So I can either solder to the mysterious "AD-DA HDR" connector plus some LEDs/switches, or connect to one of the 3 groups of pins on the wide HSMC (one has 20 differential pairs, the other two have 60 pins each) using a Samtek connector. To do that, I need to know how the pins on the SoCKit's PCB connectors map to the 5CSXFC6D6F31C6 IC's pads. BTW, I really appreciate the board having pads for an Altera JTAG connector pads: EthernetBlaster can be used with it! --A.13Views0likes2CommentsAgilex5 o_tx_ready and o_rx_ready not asserting
I'm working on a design for a video router, and having trouble with the transceivers. I have the premium devkit to test run the setup. This board has ES silicon, A5ED065BB32AE6SR0. The design would implement 4 or 8 lanes of 12.5Gbps (later 17Gbps or faster), on the GTS XCVR, PCS Direct with IEEE_FLEXE_66 implementation. I followed the User Guide to implement the startup sequence (Reset_Sequencer is OK - it handshakes src_rst_req and src_rst_grant). Figure 65 was my guideline to develop the FSM to bring the Tx and Rx lane up and running. The issue I'm observing: The TX run-time reset sequence (UG Fig 56) completes: i_tx_reset asserted → o_tx_reset_ack asserts → i_tx_reset deasserted → o_tx_pll_locked asserts → src_rs_grant completes. But o_tx_ready never asserts (o_rx_ready likewise). As an extra measure against metastability, all status signals are 2-flop synchronized before use. When I hook up the Transceiver Toolkit, it brings the same channel up reliably. What additional condition gates o_tx_ready that isn't in Figure 56, or what should I look for to get the XCVR reliable up and running. After the initial 'bring_up_sequence, I'll run 4kb packets at 64/66bit to minimize overhead, hence the FLEXE_66. I'm kind of stuck74Views0likes3CommentsInconsistent Eyes with S10 E-tile Transceiver.
Hi Support and Community. Why am I obtaining eyes sticking to the left instead of the middle? Quartus Prime Pro 26.1 Stratix 10 TX SI Signal : NRZ @1.4Gbps Channel: External Loopback (Tx+ to Rx+ Rx- via single ended to differential converter, Tx- terminated with 50 Ohms) Eye h/w: ~90/~500 PMA: Settings are on default (after initial adaptation)89Views0likes2CommentsWhy I can't change the device family in Power and Thermal Analyzer?
Description Due to a problem in the Quartus® Prime Pro Edition Software version 26.1, you may not be able to change to a different device family in Power and Thermal Analyzer (PTA) after you create or open a design. For example, if you open a design targeting a Stratix® 10 device, you may not be able to change to an Agilex® FPGA device. In version 26.1, if you select File > New File to create a new PTA design, the new file wizard does not appear. Without the wizard, you cannot select a different device family when creating a new file. Resolution PTA locks a design to the device family selected when the file is created. To explore power consumption across different device families, create a new PTA file in the target family and import your existing design. To import an existing PTA design into a different device family: Create a new PTA file targeting the desired device family. Use the Import function to bring your existing PTA design into the new file. If you chose the wrong device family when creating a file, close the existing file and create a new one. In the File menu, select New File, and select the correct device family in the new file wizard. In version 26.1 of Power and Thermal Analyzer, the new file wizard does not appear when you select New File. To work around this issue, exit and restart PTA. After restarting, select File > New File to open the new file wizard and select the correct device family.Why does Quartus® Prime Pro give an error when trying to route HPS reset signals, such as s2f_rst or s2f_cold_rst, to the Fabric using the localized Sector Clock Network?
Description Due to device architecture requirements in Altera® SoC FPGA families with a Hard Processor System (HPS), the Quartus® Prime Pro Edition Software version 25.3.1 reports a fitter routing error when you try to route certain HPS-to-FPGA reset signals to the FPGA fabric using the localized Sector Clock Network instead of the Global Clock Network. In the Agilex® FPGA architecture, there is a device-wide Global Clock Network (meant for high fan-out signals) and a localized Sector Clock Network (meant for low fan-out, smaller regional scope, or localized logic structures). Certain signals, such as s2f_rst or s2f_cold_rst, are restricted to be only on the Global Clock Network. For example, if you use: set_instance_assignment -name GLOBAL_SIGNAL OFF -to ...|hps_inst|s2f_cold_rst Quartus reports an error similar to: Error (170084): Can't route signal "...|hps_inst|s2f_cold_rst" to atom ... Resolution Certain signals, such as s2f_rst or s2f_cold_rst, are restricted to be only on the Global Clock Network. To work around this routing error in the Quartus® Prime Pro Edition Software: Remove any instance assignment that sets GLOBAL_SIGNAL to OFF for HPS-to-FPGA reset outputs (for example, s2f_rst or s2f_cold_rst). Recompile the design and allow Quartus to route these reset signals on the Global Clock Network. This behavior reflects device architecture and fitter rules; it is not scheduled to be changed to allow HPS-to-FPGA reset signals on the Sector Clock Network.
Featured Places
Community Resources
Check out the support articles on personalizing your community account, contributing to the community, and providing community feedback directly to the admin team!Tags
- troubleshooting10,393 Topics
- fpga dev tools quartus® prime software pro4,345 Topics
- FPGA Dev Tools Quartus II Software3,131 Topics
- stratix® 10 fpgas and socs1,551 Topics
- agilex® 7 fpgas and socs1,539 Topics
- arria® 10 fpgas and socs1,380 Topics
- stratix® v fpgas1,315 Topics
- arria® v fpgas and socs1,229 Topics
- Configuration1,083 Topics
- cyclone® v fpgas and socs1,058 Topics
Recent Blogs
PACKET CLASSIFICATION | FPGA | NETWORKING + SECURITY Every packet decision starts with classification. Routers, firewalls, SmartNICs, security gateways, and service-edge platforms must determine which policy applies before traffic can be forwarded, blocked, inspected, redirected, or prioritized. TCAM earned its place in these systems because it provides predictable lookup behavior and native ternary matching for ACL and LPM workloads. But as policy databases grow, search keys widen, and rules change more frequently, the traditional approach of scaling specialized ternary memory creates tougher tradeoffs in capacity, power, resource utilization, and system integration. Altera Stellar solutions takes a different approach. Instead of scaling packet classification by building ever-larger ternary-memory structures, Stellar turns classification into an optimized search problem that runs on configurable FPGA resources. The result is an FPGA-native path for large, dynamic packet-classification tables without giving up the policy semantics that made TCAM useful in the first place. TCAM scales through memory expansion. Stellar scales through search intelligence. Keep the TCAM semantics. Change the scaling model. Stellar preserves the intent of ACL, LPM, and multi-field classification, but changes how those rules are represented and searched. The Stellar Software Stack organizes policies into optimized graph structures, partitions the rule database, and continuously manages those search structures as the database evolves. The hardware then executes the search using configurable FPGA search engines while rule information is stored in conventional memory resources. Depending on the configuration, Stellar can use on-chip M20K memory, eSRAM, DDR, or HBM. That gives architects more freedom to balance throughput, capacity, latency, power, and FPGA resource use around the needs of the actual system. Use dense memory where it makes sense, and intelligence where it matters A traditional TCAM combines storage and comparison circuitry inside specialized ternary-memory arrays. That architecture delivers deterministic matching, but scaling the table means scaling the specialized comparison structure as well. Stellar separates rule storage from search execution. Ternary information can be represented as value-and-mask data in conventional memory, while graph organization and software-managed optimization direct each search toward the relevant parts of the database. As tables grow from thousands of entries toward hundreds of thousands or millions, this creates a different path for scaling capacity and power. The white paper goes deeper into why this matters, including the tradeoffs between TCAM and Stellar, the role of memory hierarchy, and a set of Stellar configurations spanning different key widths, capacities, memory resources, and projected five-tuple performance. Bring classification into the programmable datapath The value is bigger than the lookup engine itself. Stellar is designed to operate inside the FPGA alongside packet parsing, telemetry, encryption, traffic management, host-interface logic, and customer packet-processing RTL. For system architects, that means classification can become part of the same programmable platform already handling the datapath. A firewall can pair large, dynamic ACL processing with the rest of its traffic pipeline. A router can combine LPM and policy enforcement with programmable networking functions. A SmartNIC can integrate flow classification with offload and customer-specific acceleration. That system-level flexibility is especially relevant for 100GE to 400GE designs where classification must scale without consuming the platform that surrounds it. Read the full whitepaper! The full Altera white paper, Altera TCAM Alternative Solutions Scale Packet Classification to Millions of Rules for Networking Equipment, explains the architecture behind Stellar and the design choices that make it different. It covers TCAM fundamentals and scaling limits, Stellar graph-based search and software partitioning, memory-hierarchy options, configuration examples, quantitative architectural comparisons, dynamic updates, and deployment use cases across networking and security. Read the white paper See how Stellar uses search intelligence, configurable FPGA resources, and a flexible memory hierarchy to create a scalable alternative for large ACL and LPM workloads.
2 days ago0likes
4 MIN READ
September 28, 2026 The next generation of embedded systems will not be defined by compute alone. It will depend on how quickly, reliably, and intelligently systems can move data from the physical world into AI engines and turn insights back into action. That message came through clearly at Embedded World North America 2026, held September 22–24 at the Anaheim Convention Center. For Altera, the show provided an opportunity to highlight a growing collaboration with NVIDIA and demonstrate the role of FPGAs in high-performance edge AI architectures. Connecting sensors to AI with flexibility and determinism At the center of the story was NVIDIA Holoscan Sensor Bridge technology. The solution creates a high-bandwidth, low-latency path between real-world sensors and GPU-based AI processing, an increasingly important capability for robotics, industrial automation, intelligent video, medical systems, and other physical AI applications. FPGAs are well suited to this role because they can provide deterministic processing, flexible I/O, and protocol adaptation close to the sensor. Rather than forcing every application into the same hardware configuration, FPGA-based designs can be tailored to performance, connectivity, and latency requirements of a specific system. In the show’s keynote, NVIDIA Vice President Deepu Talla described the value of this flexibility: “You can select any of the Altera FPGAs depending on the application and pair them with any of the NVIDIA frameworks.” Altera’s post noted that Altera offers Holoscan Sensor Bridge solutions spanning 10G to 100G, where 25G and 100G offer significantly more bandwidth compared to other Holoscan ecosystem partners, helping developers scale connectivity for demanding edge workloads. The result is a practical sensor-to-compute architecture: Altera FPGAs handle the flexible, deterministic front end, while NVIDIA platforms provide the accelerated environment for AI and robotics workloads. An ecosystem approach to accelerating development The demonstrations also underscored that successful edge AI deployments require more than individual components. Developers need reference designs, production-ready boards, and partners that help bridge the gap between evaluation and deployment. Altera’s growing Holoscan ecosystem includes more than 10 reference designs and partner boards. These building blocks can help teams reduce integration effort and move faster from proof of concept to a real-time AI product. One example was on display at Altera partner Critical Link’s booth. Critical Link was recognized as a Best in Show Award winner in the AI & Machine Learning category at the show. Visitors to the booth could see a live demonstration of a 5-camera Holoscan Sensor Bridge solution, using Critical Link’s MitySOM-A5E as the featured Agilex® 5 FPGA hardware platform. The demonstration showed how an Agilex 5 FPGA-based system can help bring sensor data into an NVIDIA-powered AI pipeline while preserving the low-latency, high-bandwidth behavior required by edge applications. From 10G to 100G: Building the data plane for edge AI Altera’s Holoscan Sensor Bridge solutions are designed to make the sensor-to-GPU path faster and more adaptable. A recent Altera technical blog describes 10G, 25G, and 100G reference designs, including a 25G design on Agilex 5 SoC FPGAs for multi-camera sensor data flow and accelerated processing at the edge. In this architecture, the FPGA serves as the data plane: connecting to diverse sensors, aggregating streams, adapting protocols, and preprocessing data before it reaches the NVIDIA GPU. That division of labor helps reduce data-movement bottlenecks while preserving deterministic timing and giving developers room to evolve the system as sensor interfaces and AI workloads change. Altera Technical Holoscan blog for Robotics: Altera Pushes the Boundaries of Edge AI with New Holoscan Sensor Bridge Solutions | Altera Community - 355665 Watch the 25G Holoscan demo video: YouTube/Altera Why the sensor-to-compute path matters As AI moves into physical environments, system designers are balancing several competing requirements: Real-time response: Applications such as robotics and industrial inspection cannot always afford the delay of sending raw sensor data to a remote system. High-bandwidth data movement: Modern sensors generate increasingly rich data streams that must be transported without creating a bottleneck. Deterministic behavior: Safety-critical and industrial systems need predictable timing and consistent performance. Design flexibility: Product teams must support different sensors, interfaces, and deployment conditions without redesigning the entire platform. Faster development: Reference designs and ecosystem partnerships can shorten the path from concept to production. The Altera and NVIDIA approach addresses these needs by combining FPGA-based connectivity and processing with GPU-accelerated AI. It gives developers a modular foundation for building systems that can adapt as sensors, models, and application requirements evolve. Building what comes next at the edge The conversation at Embedded World North America 2026 pointed toward a broader shift in embedded design. Edge systems are becoming intelligent, connected, and increasingly autonomous, but their performance still depends on the data path that feeds them. By pairing Altera FPGAs with NVIDIA platforms and collaborating with partners such as Critical Link, developers gain more options for designing that path. The combination of flexible hardware, high-speed connectivity, and accelerated AI can help transform raw sensor input into timely decisions at the point where data is created. For teams developing the next generation of robotics, industrial automation, intelligent vision, and physical AI systems, this is the opportunity: Build a sensor-to-compute architecture that is fast enough for today’s workloads, flexible enough for tomorrow’s requirements, and ready to scale from demonstration to deployment. Learn more about Altera’s Physical AI-related Solutions: Holoscan: https://www.altera.com/fpga-solutions/sensory-interfaces Robotics: https://www.altera.com/fpga-solutions/robotics-solutions-stack Video: https://www.altera.com/fpga-solutions/video-solutions-stack
2 days ago0likes
1 MIN READ
Altera has begun shipping the new Agilex® 7 M-Series R31G multi-host acceleration package, giving customers a new way to build high-bandwidth systems that connect more hosts while moving more data through the network and memory subsystem. R31G is designed for architectures where data must move quickly between the network, memory, and multiple CPUs, GPUs, or other hosts. By bringing 800G or 2x400G Ethernet together with expanded PCIe 5.0/CXL host connectivity, the package opens new possibilities for AI NICs, storage acceleration, cloud acceleration, and other high-throughput platforms. What R31G enables More network bandwidth: 800G or 2x400G Ethernet capability for high-throughput data paths. More host connectivity: Two PCIe 5.0 x16 host interfaces, or up to four independent PCIe 5.0 x8 connections, with CXL support for flexible multi-host architectures. More memory bandwidth and I/O: DDR5-6400 and LPDDR5-6400 support, up to 204.8 GBps of memory bandwidth, and 768 GPIO in a compact 56 x 45 mm package. The result is a programmable platform that can connect, accelerate, and adapt as infrastructure requirements evolve, while keeping high-speed networking, host connectivity, and memory bandwidth tightly integrated. More network bandwidth. More hosts. More memory bandwidth. One programmable platform. Learn more in the Agilex® 7 M-Series product site.
9 days ago0likes
As AI, cloud, and high-performance computing systems continue to scale, data center operators need more bandwidth within increasingly constrained power and thermal envelopes. Linear Pluggable Optics (LPO) offers an important path forward by simplifying optical modules, reducing power consumption, and lowering latency. LPO places signal-conditioning responsibilities in the host device, allowing the optical module to operate without the DSP used in traditional retimed optics. This architecture can reduce optical module power by 30% to 40%, helping data center designers increase connectivity density while simplifying cooling and thermal management. Altera Brings LPO to the FPGA Market Altera is the first FPGA provider to publicly demonstrate Linear Pluggable Optics interoperability using production FPGA devices. Continued validation with LPO modules from Amphenol and FS further demonstrates the breadth of the emerging ecosystem supported by Altera. Agilex® 7 FPGAs and SoCs bring the power and latency advantages of LPO to programmable platforms used in SmartNICs, data processing units, AI accelerators, and custom infrastructure. The initial public demonstration established that Agilex 7 devices could successfully interoperate with 400G LPO modules. The latest validation advances that milestone by confirming that the implementation meets the performance requirements expected for deployment in demanding data center environments. Validated for Real Deployment Conditions Comprehensive testing confirms that Agilex 7 F-Tile transceivers meet the electrical and link-performance requirements defined by the 100G-DR-LPO specification. The validation demonstrated: Compliance with the required transmit, receive, and link-performance criteria Successful interoperability with LPO modules from Amphenol and FS Successful LPO connectivity across distances from 1 meter to 500 meters Consistent performance across temperature and voltage conditions Measurable performance margin beyond required thresholds Testing covered demanding signal conditions, voltage variation, and temperatures ranging from minus 40 degrees Celsius to 105 degrees Celsius for electrical characterization. Functional link testing included a 1-meter LPO connection, a 100-meter active optical cable, and 500-meter LPO modules from Amphenol and FS. The results demonstrate robust, repeatable operation across multiple module suppliers and link distances, with measurable margin relative to the required performance limits. For customers, this validation provides confidence that Agilex® 7 support for LPO is ready for real-world deployment. Following the industry’s first public FPGA interoperability demonstration, the solution has now been evaluated against LPO performance requirements using modules from multiple suppliers and over link distances up to 500 meters. Together, these results demonstrate a practical foundation for deploying LPO connectivity in next-generation data center systems. More Efficient Connectivity for AI and Cloud Infrastructure The value of LPO grows as data centers deploy more high-speed optical connections. Eliminating the DSP from each optical module can reduce power across thousands of links, simplify optical module design, ease thermal pressure at the front panel, and support lower-latency data movement. Agilex 7 FPGAs add programmability to this more efficient optical architecture. Customers can combine LPO connectivity with packet processing, acceleration, security, telemetry, and evolving protocol support on a single adaptable platform. This flexibility is especially valuable for AI clusters and cloud infrastructure, where workloads, network architectures, and connectivity standards continue to evolve. Validation with multiple module vendors also gives system designers greater flexibility as the LPO supplier ecosystem continues to develop. Ready for the Next Generation of Data Centers The combination of public interoperability and comprehensive validation marks a major step for LPO in the FPGA market. Altera has demonstrated that LPO works with production Agilex 7 devices and validated that the solution meets key LPO requirements with measurable operating margin. This gives customers a proven foundation for evaluating and deploying lower-power, lower-latency optical connectivity in real data center environments. With Agilex® 7 FPGAs, LPO is ready for real-world data center deployment.
1 month ago0likes
Security requirements are entering a new phase. Systems being designed today may remain deployed for many years, while regulatory expectations, cryptographic standards, and threat models continue to evolve. For designs in industrial, communications, infrastructure, aerospace, defense, and embedded applications, long-term security is becoming a core platform requirement. FPGA-based designs allow designs to meet today’s security needs and evolve with tomorrow’s requirements. Altera is now offering Agilex® 3 and Agilex® 5 devices with PQC-enabled secure boot and configuration support, helping customers prepare for the next generation of security requirements. With the Quartus® Prime Pro Edition 26.1.1 release, customers can begin using a PQC flow that works with Agilex 3 and Agilex 5 based hardware. This milestone extends the security architecture already built into the Agilex platform. Agilex devices use the Secure Device Manager as a hardware root of trust for secure configuration and device management. By combining PQC-capable devices with Quartus software enablement, Altera is helping customers strengthen the FPGA chain of trust as post-quantum requirements move from planning to implementation. The value is immediate and practical. Customers can start designing with supported devices today, while using Quartus 26.1.1 to take advantage of the current software flow. This gives teams a path to address emerging compliance and security expectations without needing a future platform redesign. The same hardware foundation also allows for additional security enhancements over time. Customers designing with PQC-capable Agilex 3 and Agilex 5 devices can benefit from planned software and firmware improvements enabled by the underlying hardware, with no further FPGA hardware upgrade required for those enhancements. Agilex 3 devices bring this capability to power- and cost-optimized FPGA and SoC designs used in embedded, edge, industrial, control, and platform-management applications. Agilex 5 devices extend the same security direction into mid-range FPGA and SoC designs that require higher performance, greater integration, and broader system capability. Post-quantum readiness will continue to advance, and Altera is building that evolution into the Agilex platform roadmap. With PQC-capable Agilex 3 and Agilex 5 devices and Quartus 26.1.1 software enablement, customers have a practical starting point today and a scalable foundation for future security enhancements.
1 month ago0likes