Recent Discussions
Agilex3/5 GTS Hard Ethernet IP 10G example design pin loc and io std wanted
Where can I find any public available dev kit design example for the Agilex3 or Agilex which can implement the GTS Eth HIP as generated by Quartus Pro v25.3 and successfully build a sof file? A set of pin locations and IO standard settings for the AXE5 Eagle would be optimal, but any other dev kit would be helpful. According to the "GTS Ethernet Hard IP User Guide: Agilex 3 FPGAs and SoCs" (848477) page 29 under "Target Development Kit Tab" is says: "Target development kit option specifies the target development kit used to generate the project. Ensure the pin assignments in the .qsf file are appropriate." But it seems like this will only set the BOARD parameter in the resulting qsf, e.g. when using the Premium Development Kit it results in the following addtion to the qsf file: set_global_assignment -name BOARD "Agilex 5 FPGA E-Series 065B Premium Development Kit DK-A5E065BB32AES1" which results in no location or IO standard settings in the qsf and I/O Assignment Warnings in the fitter report after the build: +-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ ; I/O Assignment Warnings ; +-----------------------+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ ; Pin Name ; Reason ; +-----------------------+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ ; o_tx_serial_data[0] ; Incomplete set of assignments. Missing I/O standard, drive strength and slew rate assignments ; ; o_tx_serial_data_n[0] ; Incomplete set of assignments. Missing I/O standard, drive strength and slew rate assignments ; ; qsfp_lowpwr ; Incomplete set of assignments. Missing I/O standard, drive strength and slew rate assignments ; ; qsfp_rstn ; Incomplete set of assignments. Missing I/O standard, drive strength and slew rate assignments ; ; i_reconfig_clk ; Missing I/O standard ; ; i_rx_serial_data_n[0] ; Missing I/O standard ; ; i_rx_serial_data[0] ; Missing I/O standard ; ; i_clk_ref_p ; Missing I/O standard ; ; o_tx_serial_data[0] ; Missing location assignment ; ; o_tx_serial_data_n[0] ; Missing location assignment ; ; qsfp_lowpwr ; Missing location assignment ; ; qsfp_rstn ; Missing location assignment ; ; i_reconfig_clk ; Missing location assignment ; ; i_rx_serial_data_n[0] ; Missing location assignment ; ; i_rx_serial_data[0] ; Missing location assignment ; ; i_clk_ref_p ; Missing location assignment ; ; i_refclk2pll_p ; Missing location assignment ; +-----------------------+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ Whenever I try to assign these myself I get errors like Error (14566): The Fitter cannot place 1 periphery component(s) due to conflicts with existing constraints (1 IPFLUXTOP_UXTOP_WRAP(s)). Fix the errors described in the submessages, and then rerun the Fitter. The Intel FPGA Knowledge Database may also contain articles with information on how to resolve this periphery placement failure. Review the errors and then visit the Knowledge Database at https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/support/programmable/kdb-filter.html and search for this specific error message number. Error (175001): The Fitter cannot place 1 IPFLUXTOP_UXTOP_WRAP, which is within GTS Ethernet Hard IP ex_10G_intel_eth_gts_1000_6dyx4dq. or this or other type of layout or clocking type constraint errors: Error (11216): Output port "O_SYSPLL_C0" of "SM_HSSI_PLL_WRAP" cannot connect to PLD port "CLK" of "FF" for node "kr_dut|intel_eth_anlt_gts_0|ip_inst|sip_inst|u_intel_eth_anlt_gts_csr_top|u__intel_eth_anlt_gts_csr_avmm_arb|o_avmm_rdata[0]". It would be nice if I could obtain a set of correct and working pin assignment which actually results in a working sof file so I can try to understand what the actual constraints are. Is there a dev kit as described which the pin assignments are generated or provided or could anybody please provide a set of pin assignments for the above signals for a dev kit? Cheers!
Agilex 7 I Series Development Kit: External hardware access error when programming
I have a compiled design that I would like to test that implements Ethernet on F-Tile. When I try to program the FPGA with my bitstream, it stops and prompts me with the following errors: Would anyone know how to fix this or have insight on why this is happening?
Inquiry: Reference Clock Jitter Limits for 1G Operation on Agilex 5
Hello, According to GTS transceiver reference clock specifications of the Agilex 5 (GTS Transceiver Performance • Agilex™ 5 FPGAs and SoCs Device Data Sheet • Altera Documentation and Resources Center), the RMS jitter integrated from 10 kHz – 20 MHz, including spurs, is indicated as 522fs (maximum value). We are using in our design a 156.25MHz clock (AX3DAF1-156.2500 from abracon), and the measured jitter is ~1ps currently. We would like to know if this specification is for specific performances or if it’s a strict specification. (in our case, it’ll be for a 1G operation) Thanks, Best RegardsF-tile 10GBASE-R firecode FEC IP (Agilex 7)
Hi! We require to support 10GBASE-R clause 74 (firecode) FEC + PCS. This option isn't available in the Agile 7 F-Tile hard FEC IP. It is available for 25G rates, but we need it specifically for 10G. Our application doesn't require a MAC, in other rates we are to use PCS/MII mode It seems the only way forward is a soft firecode FEC + PCS, which would could connect to our FGT in PMA direct mode. Is this correct, and does altera provide an equivalent soft IP in order to support this configuration?
F-Tile Ethernet Hard IP Design Example - Testbench
I have a question regarding this Ftile Ethernet hard IP example Design. I am able to generate this example design for 400gbe. I am able to load this design (sof) to MA2700Kit. I was able to run tcl script and internal loopback test was successful. I was also able to run testbench basic_avl_tb_top.sv and VSIM run was successful. I have following questions and areas where I need help. At line 144 and 145 in basic_avl_tb_top.sv I can see that Tx outputs are assigned Rx input pins. I would like to understand reason for doing this? I mean shouldn’t the RX lines driven by tasks/function to simulate incoming packets over the ethernet link? I want to modify the testbench to simulate Receiving of a particular 98 byte ethernet frame, and check how mac segmented interface is behaving to communicate this frame; So i can write my custom RTL block to receive it properly. I need help developing tasks/function to simulate incoming packets over the ethernet link. Thank youRegarding MIPI CSI 2 TX
Hi, In my Project, I have to generate test pattern data and send it to MIPI CSI 2 via AXI stream, and MIPI CSI 2 will send the pixel data to link_0 of MIPI DPHY IP , but when i try to simulate the design(includes MIPI CSI 2 and MIPI DHPY IP interconnected), mipi_dphy_0/LINK0_CK_Stopstate is constantly high, I guess this signal is supposed to go low after T INT time, and also ready Singal from axi_stream is asserted low after being high for three clock cycles, i didn't understand why. Any help is appreciated.
DDR4 Problem Migrating from Arria 10 016 to 048
We have a board design that supports an F29 package Arria 10. It has two DDR4 interfaces running at an 1866 data rate. In the past an 016 chip with DDR4-2400 ICs worked fine. We needed more logic so we migrated to an 048. Because of parts availability we had to migrate to DDR-3200 ICs. The board layout has not changed and we believe the various power supplies and clocks are working fine. The 048 design fails calibration and won't even allow running "EMIF toolkit - Create Memory Interface." It hangs and times out. If I turn off address / command leveling the design still fails calibration but now I can create a memory interface and see the calibration results which show a complete failure with write and read margins. The design is badly broken but we don't know if it is the 048 or DDR4, or a combination of both. The DDR4 IP was regenerated and adjusted for the DDR4-3200 ICs. We do see PLL lock with signaltap and can actually run Efficiency monitor. So the core is supplying a good clock to the fabric. Any suggestions are welcome! Thanks, Mike
