Forum Widgets
Recent Discussions
Arria 10 SoC – USB devices always enumerating as Full-Speed (Yocto 4.1, dwc2)
Hello, My name is Ángel and I am currently working with an Intel SoC FPGA Arria 10. I am trying to connect an Intel RealSense SR300 camera to my system, but I am experiencing USB speed negotiation issues. Environment: Platform: Intel SoC FPGA Arria 10 OS: Linux (custom image built with Yocto 4.1 Langdale) USB driver: dwc2 librealsense built with -DFORCE_RSUSB_BACKEND=ON When I connect the RealSense SR300 camera, the USB link does not negotiate correctly and the device is always enumerated as Full-Speed (12M) instead of High-Speed or SuperSpeed. At first, I suspected a problem with the USB 3.0 connector of the SR300. However, when I tested with a standard USB 2.0 webcam, I observed exactly the same behavior: the device is still enumerated only as Full-Speed (12M). This suggests the issue is likely related to the USB controller configuration on the Arria 10 rather than the camera itself. System Output lsusb -t: /: Bus 01.Port 1: Dev 1, Class=root_hub, Driver=dwc2/1p, 480M |__ Port 1: Dev 2, If 0, Class=Vendor Specific Class, Driver=, 12M |__ Port 1: Dev 2, If 1, Class=Audio, Driver=, 12M |__ Port 1: Dev 2, If 2, Class=Audio, Driver=, 12M dmesg: [ 204.765768] usb 1-1: new full-speed USB device number 2 using dwc2 Yocto local.conf: MACHINE = "arria10" DISTRO_FEATURES:append = " systemd vfat" DISTRO_FEATURES:remove = " sysvinit" VIRTUAL-RUNTIME_init_manager = "systemd" IMAGE_INSTALL:append = " kernel-module-uvcvideo" KERNEL_MODULE_AUTOLOAD += "uvcvideo" IMAGE_INSTALL:append = " \ packagegroup-core-boot \ pciutils \ usbutils \ v4l-utils \ i2c-tools \ librealsense2 \ " EXTRA_OECMAKE:append:pn-librealsense2 = " -DFORCE_RSUSB_BACKEND=ON" Any guidance would be greatly appreciated.
Agilex5 - Bridge AXI F2H - read transactions
Hi, we are using in our design the bridge F2H between FPGA and HPS, which is a bus ACE5lite 256bits. Several masters AXI 64bits in our design will contact it via an interconnect. In Write, no problem, we can attaquer this interface in « narrow transfers » 64b over 256b, in conformity with ARM specification. But in READ, the SoC user manual (814346, 2026.01.09) says §11.5.1 : « The HPS F2H interface has a fixed data size of 256-bits. This interface allows for narrow burst sizes less than 256-bits However, if a fabric initiator generates a transfer narrower than the interface width (i.e., less than the 256-bits wide data and a nonzero burst size), there is no guarantee that the HPS F2H interface will respond with narrower data aligned on non-256-bit boundaries of the 256-bit data bus. For example, if ARADDR = 0x0010_0000, ARSIZE = 0x4, and ARLEN = 0x3, the HPS F2H interface returns two beats of 32 bytes per beat followed by two null cycles, instead of four beats of 16 bytes per beat. Altera recommends that you add width adaptation interconnect logic between the fabric initiator and the HPS F2H interface to ensure that the narrow-width data is packed/unpacked properly.” « the HPS F2H interface returns » : means it is sure that… , we will be able logic tranlation 256>64 considering that data returned on RDATA bus will fill all width of 256b (if enough read bytes of course). If “there is no guarantee…” is correct, it is a problem as there is no Read Strobe with bus RDATA in AXI spécification ; and we can not determine which bytes of which BEATs of transfert have to be considered. Last possible interpretation : the ‘width adaptation interconnect logic’ recommanded by Altera concerns more the transformation of ARADDR/ARSIZE/ARLEN by our interconnect at bridge input (AR* parameters are requests of read sent by our masters should be translated by interconnect before to be presented to bridge). Can you tell me the right meaning ? Thanks and regardsAgilex 5 Premium Dev Kit Ethernet Performance
Hello! We built the golden sample image following the HPS GSRD User Guide with additional packages to profile/evaluate the board and experience performance problems when sending data over ethernet. The test setup is a host connected to the dev kit and sending data to test the throughput. First, we used iperf3 with zero copy flag, which caps at about 940 Mbit/s with almost no variation. Without zero copy, iperf3 caps at about ~880 Mbit/s with some variation down to 629 Mbit/s, see attachment 1.png. With our custom application that also does some additional work, we’d expect about 430-440 Mbit/s, but cap at about 300 Mbit/s, with lots of time spent in kernel again, see attachment 2.png. From the first investigation, we suspect the driver can’t keep up with the generated data and can’t send it fast enough to the host. We are wondering whether we can adjust something in the kernel (driver) or in the image so that we can improve the throughput with heavy workloads. Kind regards!
Support Request to Debug Signal Tap Issue with SoC Based Design(GHRD) on Agilex-7 FPGA
Hi Altera Support Team, Greetings from Logic Fruit Technologies. This is Bhanu Pratap and I am working on the project in which we are using Agilex-7 SOC FPGA. Goal: Utilize Agiliex-HPS's capability on a Linux OS to control dynamic features of IP Cores at runtime. Problem Statement: We are facing an issue detecting SignalTap with SoC-based designs for runtime debugging while it's enabled and added from the Quartus project to generate the programming file. Brief Description: We are using Quartus 2025.1.1 and Altera's Agilex-7 Devkit(DKSIAAGI027FA: Agilex™ 7 FPGA I-Series Transceiver-SoC Development Kit -> 4x F-Tile, Rev C). We downloaded the base GHRD design from Altera's GitHub webpage for the corresponding Quartus version. We are following each step to test GHRD and build generation for the Linux OS. We are using HPS First booting mode, we generated the build without modification and tested it. It's working fine according to the GSRD user guide. We have added a custom AXI4 Slave based CSR module to the HSP Lightweight bus to test basic register read/write using Platform Designer. We regenerated the build and re-tested but we are not getting the expected results so we added SignalTap for debugging. Build is generated using the STP file, programmed, and the OS is booting but it's not detecting SignalTap. This looks more like a process gap. We seek your support to fix this issue. Note: If we use an FPGA design without HPS, we are able to add and detect SignalTap. Seeking for urgent support. Thanks Bhanu Pratap
Release 25.3.1 PRO
Version: Release 25.3.1 PRO Quartus Build/TAG: B100/QPDS25.3.1_REL_GSRD_PR Release Date: January 16, 2026 Device Affected: Agilex™ 3, Agilex™ 5, Agilex™ 7 Release Type: Major release/Binary release Binary Release Path: http://releases.rocketboards.org/2026.01/ Release Page: https://github.com/altera-fpga/gsrd-socfpga/releases/tag/QPDS25.3.1_REL_GSRD_PR Major Features Released Roll-your-own Linux GSRD 2.0 for Agilex™ 5 PDK OOBE DC on baseline design. Created the GSRD 2.0 rol-your-own Linux script for the Agilex™ 5 E-Series Premium DevKit with OOBE daughtercard for the GHRD 2.0 baseline design. Removed Legacy GSRD from Agilex™ 5 Premium Development kit + OOB Daughter card, keeping only Baseline (GSRD 2.0).Timings eMMC
Hi, latest datasheet of SoC « 813918/2026.01.05 » lists in paragraph « HPS SD/eMMC Timing Characteristics » the constraints of eMMC, applicable to memory component but does not define any timing data in input/output of SoC. There is no Tco min/max of CMD/DATA at SoC output, as well as Tsetup/hold of CMD/DATA at SoC input. Can you provide Tco and Tsetup/hold for eMMC usage (Legacy, HS_SDR, HS_DDR, HS200, HS400) ? thanksS10 hps fpga2sdram bridge low speed
Hello, i have some problems I have a project with stratix 10 with hps I need to use ddr4 with hps, so I enabled 3 fpga2sdram bridges with 128 bit width Via u-boot smc configured and enabled them, but measured speed is not enough. When I use onle one bridge my speed is approximately 32 gbit/s (bridge and master frequency 350 MHz) But when I use all 3 bridges it becomes 20 gbit/s I use avmm bridge to connect to axi fpga2sdram bridge with 128 bits width, max pending writes 16, max burst size 128, use only write to bridge ECC in emif (hmc) is disabled I tried to use QoS for bridges, set them to bypass P.S. If i use the same board with firmware without hps, i get 130 gbit/s (with disabled hps) Quartus Pro 21.4 Any help would be useful!
Agilex 5/3 FreeRTOS SMP Support
Stable Version: v25.4 Quartus Version: 25.4 Supported devices: Agilex™ 3 and Agilex™ 5 Source : https://github.com/Ignitarium-Technology/freertos-socfpga Branch/Tag: v25.4-SMP Release Date: March 30, 2026 Hello Everyone, FreeRTOS port for A55/A76 HPS now supports SMP. visit the GitHub page for instructions on how to get started. Features and comments Features Agilex3 Agilex5 Agilex3 SMP Agilex5 SMP (A55 x 2 or A76 x 2) Supported features Limitations/ Known issues A55 boot Yes Yes Yes Yes Single core boot, Dual core SMP A76 boot NA Yes NA Yes Single core boot, Dual core SMP QSPI boot Yes Yes Yes Yes SD boot Yes Yes Yes Yes eMMC boot Yes Yes Yes Yes NAND boot No No No No Clk mngr driver Yes Yes Yes Yes API to get clock speed of different blocks Reset mngr driver Yes Yes Yes Yes Peripheral reset assert/de-assert DMA driver Yes Yes Yes Yes Memory to memory transfer Only support memory to memory GPIO driver Yes Yes Yes Yes Write, read and interrupt support Timer driver Yes Yes Yes Yes User defined and free running modes UART driver Yes Yes Yes Yes Full duplex Tx and Rx DMA not supported (Planned for future release I2C driver Yes Yes Yes Yes Master mode write and read Standard and fast modes DMA not supported (Planned for future release I3C driver Yes Yes Yes Yes Master mode write and read i3c and legacy i2c devices IBI not supported (Planned for future release) SPI driver Yes Yes Yes Yes Master mode write and read DMA is not supported QSPI driver Yes Yes Yes Yes QSPI flash read/write/erase NAND driver No No No No SDM mailbox driver Yes Yes Yes Yes SDM commands with SIP_SVC SMMU enable support Yes Yes Yes Yes Static identity mapping for cache coherency SDMMC driver Yes Yes Yes Yes standard and HS speeds SDMMC and eMMC devices Fat FS support Ethernet stack Yes Yes Yes Yes TCP/IP, UDP, ICMP and DHCP IPv4 and IPv6 support USB 2.0 stack NT Yes NT Yes USB mass storage class Tested with a custom board and SOF USB 3.1 stack NT Yes NT Yes USB mass storage operation WDT diver Yes Yes Yes Yes interrupt or reset on timer expiry EDAC support Yes Yes Yes Yes Error injection and detection for EMAC, USB and QSPI blocks OCRAM not supported IOSSM driver Yes Yes Yes Yes Error injection and detection Bridge driver NT Yes NT Yes Enable, Disable Reboot mngr Yes Yes Yes Yes Warm/Cold reboot FPGA manager Yes Yes Yes Yes FPGA configuration Yes: Feature available and tested, No: Feature not available in SDK, NA : Not applicable , NT: Not tested Note: If you find any issues, please raise an issue in the GitHub page. For more support/assistance visit our website .HPS f2sdram read/write errors
I'm using the Agilex 5 devlopment board and trying to write to the HPS SDRAM with custom logic. I'm already able to write to the other SDRAM (DDR4) on the board with my custom logic going through the AXI4 bus on the hps_subsys, I exported the f2sdram (AXI4 Subordinate) and connected to my custom logic. I can perform read and write cycles and everything flows correctly. I get appropriate response from the f2sdram. however, on both read and write cycles, the f2sdram responds with the RRESP/BRESP of b11, decode error. i have tried to read/write to addresses of 0x0000000000, 0x8800000000, and 0xffff000000 and still get the same response error code. Anything common that I might have missed in my setup?
