Forum Discussion
Altera_Forum
Honored Contributor
Honored ContributorDifferent results on hardware compared to simulator
I'm having trouble when I run my code on the actual Cyclone III FPGA. In the simulator it works fine. I have set up state machines to make sure that clock signals to registers are occurring after plenty of data setup time has passed. I'm running the chip with just a 14 MHz clock so its not very fast.
In ModelSim everything works perfectly. My code is modular so I am building up the final code one module at a time. I can put in several modules, test, and everything works as expected. But at some point when I add in another module everything starts to go wrong. Modules that worked earlier no longer work. I added in some ports on the modules to bring out the data to some external LEDS so I can see what the signals are doing. Often that causes the code to just start working again properly. The results are very inconsistent as I make changes to the code. What am I missing here that makes the code work incorrectly on the actual hardware?25 Replies
Altera_ForumI have gone through the TimeQuest online course and I understand the basics. I am working through the main Quartus Interactive Tutorial on timing. But still have some puzzles.
My design uses a multiplexed address/data bus (data_io) with an address latch enable (ale), wr and rd signals. There is also a 14.7456 MHz clock coming into the FPGA which I use to run the internal processes. A cycle of writing to the FPGA would start with placing an address on the data_io, then set the ale high, then low again. The high time is about 1us so its much slower than the clock. The data_io is valid about 1us before the rising edge of the ale. A write cycle is virtually the same but uses the wr signal going high for 1 us. In TimeQuest I created the 14 MHz clock just fine. Now it thinks that ale and wr and rd are also clocks and I need to constrain them. Of course, they do not have a regular repeating cycle. There is only those 1us pulses occuring when we want to communicate with the FPGA. So how does one define that in terms of a clock? Also, I cannot control the relationship of the fast clock signal to the ale, wr, or rd signals. I created a "clock" that is the ale input port with a period of 2000ns (1us high time). So my clocks look like this: create_clock -name {clk_14Mhz} -period 67.817 -waveform { 0.000 33.908 } [get_ports {clk}] create_clock -name {ale} -period 2000.000 -waveform { 0.000 1000.000 } [get_ports {ale}] Should I just lengthen the period of the ale and set the fall time to 1000 to simulate closer to what the ale would be doing?- Altera_Forum
The most important issue is that a signal is viewed as clock if it is used to edge trigger any register since it will be connected to clk port of flips.
The safest thing for a beginner is one clock for all registers. As to tristating inside fpga: you don't need that as it is going to be implemented as muxes and will complicate coding on you. - Altera_Forum--- Quote Start --- The most important issue is that a signal is viewed as clock if it is used to edge trigger any register since it will be connected to clk port of flips. The safest thing for a beginner is one clock for all registers. As to tristating inside fpga: you don't need that as it is going to be implemented as muxes and will complicate coding on you. --- Quote End --- Basically I have used the main clock to clock all the registers. But then the data in registers is decoded and enables lower level logic. So, how can I implement a bi-directional bus?
- Altera_Forum
As I understood you have used wr, rd as clocks. It does not matter to the compiler if they are regular pulses or not. It will be clocks if used with clock edge assignment.
for bidirectional bus: you don't have to think of bidirectionality. just use two buses, one for each direction until such a point you interface them to actual bidir pins. - Altera_Forum
I understand that any signal used as the edge to clock a register is considered a clock. I am getting warnings that the launch and latch times between source clock: ale and destination clock: clk are outside legal time range. Ale is basically asynchronous with the main clk. How can I tell it that? I used create_clock not create_generated_clock since ale has nothing to do with the main clk. I guess that is considered another clock domain.
Bidirectional Busses: OK, Got it. Don't use bidirectional busses inside the FPGA to communicate between modules. Just use a data_in and a data_out bus. I will rewrite my code to do this. I am beginning to see improvement with even partial timing constraints set. So far the hardware is working correctly. I will see if it behaves properly as more design changes are made. - Altera_Forum
As I said before the safest method is one clock system with various rate control adjusted through clk enable. If you have to use more than one clk then you need to cross clk domains which is tricky for a beginner.
- Altera_Forum
I'm trying to get rid of this warning:
All 8 bits in my addr_register have this warning. If I make the address register very simple like this it works and that warning goes away:Warning (13004): Presettable and clearable registers converted to equivalent circuits with latches. Registers power-up to an undefined state, and DEVCLRn places the registers in an undefined state. Warning (13310): Register "addr_register" is converted into an equivalent circuit using register "addr_register~_emulated" and latch "addr_register~latch"
However, what I want is to automatically increment the addr_register after every rd or wr. There are other conditions on the increment which I have combined into a single bit called addr_incr. So here is the code with the increment operation added in:always_ff @ (posedge ale_clk) begin addr_register <= data_in; end
Now it creates that warning and converts this into a latch. This is happening in several areas of my code wherever I implement any kind of increment or decrement on a register. Is this OK? If not, how do you increment or decrement a register?always_ff @ (posedge ale_clk, negedge end_rd_or_wr) begin if (ale_clk) addr_register <= data_in; else addr_register <= addr_register + addr_incr; end - Altera_Forum
The implementation for your design depends on the timing relationship between signals.
Even though ALE is called "Address Latch Enable", it does not have to be used as a latch enable, rather it can be used as a register enable. The same goes for the read and write signals, if they are synchronous to the clock signal, you can use them combinatorially to create the address increment signal. If the external bus is completely asynchronous to any clock you have access to, then the logic becomes quite different. If you are using an FPGA that contains a PLL, then you can generally create an internal clock that can be used to oversample and synchronize external signals. If the processor interface has a wait-state control, then you can extend bus read/write cycles to meet timing. So what bus are you trying to interface to? Cheers, Dave - Altera_Forum
You really want to keep everything driven off _one_ clock in the system. This means oversampling ale etc, detecting edges and doing the appropriate thing.
Normally I'd use one of the PLLs to generate a clock 4 or 5 (or more) * the rate of what I'm sampling, but if your data is stable for 1us and ALE is 1us wide then the 14MHz clock should be sufficient. A simple example follows of how I'd do your address latching and incrementing in VHDL....
It's good practice to register asynchronous signals in twice to guard against metastability. I then register ale in again to compare it with the first 'stable' version. If the address is stable long before Ale goes active you probably don't have to register it in but it's a habit. In other applications you could adjust the number of times it's sampled depending on set up and hold times wrt Ale. If your design is done correctly you should have exactly the same hardware behaviour from each re-build. Differing behaviour means the design is incorrect or something isn't constrained properly. Again I hope this helps. Nial.signal addr_in_d, addr_in_2d : std_logic_vector(7 downto 0); signal ale_d, ale_2d, ale_3d : std_logic; signal address : std_logic_vector(10 downto 0); : process(clk,rst) begin if(rst = '1') then addr_in_d <= (others => '0'); addr_in_2d <= (others => '0'); ale_d <= '0'; ale_2d <= '0'; ale_3d <= '0'; elsif(rising_edge(clk)) then addr_in_d <= cpu_addr; addr_in_2d <= addr_in_d; ale_d <= ale; ale_2d <= ale_d; ale_3d <= ale_2d; if(ale_2d = '1' and ale_3d = '0') then -- Detect the rising edge of Ale and.. address <= addr_in_2d; -- ..register in the address.. elsif(inc_address = '1') then -- ..or if inc address is active address <= address + 1; -- increment it. end if; end if; end process; - Altera_Forum--- Quote Start --- The implementation for your design depends on the timing relationship between signals. Even though ALE is called "Address Latch Enable", it does not have to be used as a latch enable, rather it can be used as a register enable. The same goes for the read and write signals, if they are synchronous to the clock signal, you can use them combinatorially to create the address increment signal. If the external bus is completely asynchronous to any clock you have access to, then the logic becomes quite different. If you are using an FPGA that contains a PLL, then you can generally create an internal clock that can be used to oversample and synchronize external signals. If the processor interface has a wait-state control, then you can extend bus read/write cycles to meet timing. So what bus are you trying to interface to? Cheers, Dave --- Quote End --- We are using a TS-7400 CPU board which basically has a 20 bit data IO bus that comes off of a CPLD on their board. They use a EP9302 processor chip which is running from the 14.7456 MHz crystal. However, I do not know about whats happening internal to that processor. The 9302 talks to their CPLD and manipulates the data IO bus. They also pass the 14 MHz clock signal through their CPLD (which ends up being the FPGA clk) and they can turn it off or on in the CPLD (which means there must be delays as it passes through their CPLD). We have decided to use 8 bits as a multiplexed addr/data bus and 3 other lines as ale, rd, and wr. Because of the number of IO lines we need from the FPGA its not practical to use more lines to interface to the TS7400. So our code that runs on the TS7400 basically goes through this process: Set the Data Direction Register (DDR) for DIO[7:0] to output. Place the data on the data bus. Set the ale (or wr) bit high. Set the ale (or wr) bit low. Read cycles would by like this: Set the DDR for DIO[7:0] to input. Set the rd bit high. Read the DIO[7:0] data Set the rd bit low. By scope measurements I have determined that the rate that we can go through this process takes about 1us for each steo (depending on what instructions we need to execute). That means when writing (addr or data) the data will be on the DIO bus about 1 us before the rising edge of ale or wr and will be held there until about 1 us after the falling edge of ale or wr. We would read data in about 1 us after asserting rd. Seems like plenty of setup and hold time to me though the ale, wr, and rd are not necessarily synchronous with the clk signal. The ale_clk in the code that I showed earlier is just a gated version of clk made like this: assign ale_clk = (clk & ale); In my inexperience I have been coding all register transfers using edge triggered blocks like this:
Would it be better in some cases to use logic levels, not egdes? And does that mean necessarily that its combinatorial logic rather that flip flops?always_ff @ (posedge ale, negedge end_rd_or_wr) begin if (ale) addr_reg <= data_in; else addr_reg <= addr_reg + addr_incr; end
