Difference in SystemVerilog-2005 HDL simulation behavior between Quartus Prime and ModelSim

I am testing a SystemVerilog module by comparing the simulation results between the two following cases:

Case 1: Compiling in Quartus Prime and then simulating in ModelSim-Intel
Case 2: Compiling in ModelSim-Intel and then simulating in ModelSim-Intel

The following is the SystemVerilog code:

module always_ff_process();

reg [7:0] sum,a,b;
reg       parity;
logic     clk = 0;
reg       rst = 0;

initial begin
  $monitor ("@%g clk = %b rst = %b a = %h b = %h sum = %h parity = %b", 
  $time, clk, rst, a, b, sum, parity);
  #1 rst = 1;
  #5 rst = 0;
  #2 a = 1;
  #2 b = 1;
  #2 a = 10;
  #2 $finish;
end

always #1 clk ++;

// use of iff makes sure that block does not get
// triggered due to posedge of clk when rst == 1
always_ff @(posedge clk iff rst == 0 or posedge rst)
begin : ADDER
  if (rst) begin
    sum    <= 0;
    parity <= 0;
    $display ("Reset is asserted BLOCK 1");
  end else begin
    sum    <= b + a;
    parity <= ^(b + a);
  end
end

// To show how iff affected in earlier code
always_ff @(posedge clk or posedge rst)
begin
  if (rst) begin
    $display ("Reset is asserted BLOCK 2");
  end 
end

endmodule

I obtain the following simulation results for Case 1:

@0 clk = 0 rst = 0 a = xx b = xx sum = xx parity = x
Reset is asserted BLOCK 1
Reset is asserted BLOCK 2
@1 clk = 1 rst = 1 a = xx b = xx sum = 00 parity = 0
@2 clk = 0 rst = 1 a = xx b = xx sum = 00 parity = 0
Reset is asserted BLOCK 1
Reset is asserted BLOCK 2
@3 clk = 1 rst = 1 a = xx b = xx sum = 00 parity = 0
@4 clk = 0 rst = 1 a = xx b = xx sum = 00 parity = 0
Reset is asserted BLOCK 1
Reset is asserted BLOCK 2
@5 clk = 1 rst = 1 a = xx b = xx sum = 00 parity = 0
@6 clk = 0 rst = 0 a = xx b = xx sum = 00 parity = 0
@7 clk = 1 rst = 0 a = xx b = xx sum = xx parity = x
@8 clk = 0 rst = 0 a = 01 b = xx sum = xx parity = x
@9 clk = 1 rst = 0 a = 01 b = xx sum = xx parity = x
@10 clk = 0 rst = 0 a = 01 b = 01 sum = xx parity = x
@11 clk = 1 rst = 0 a = 01 b = 01 sum = 02 parity = 1
@12 clk = 0 rst = 0 a = 0a b = 01 sum = 02 parity = 1
@13 clk = 1 rst = 0 a = 0a b = 01 sum = 0b parity = 1

I obtain the following simulation results for Case 2:

@0 clk = 0 rst = 0 a = xx b = xx sum = xx parity = x
Reset is asserted BLOCK 2
Reset is asserted BLOCK 1
@1 clk = 1 rst = 1 a = xx b = xx sum = 00 parity = 0
@2 clk = 0 rst = 1 a = xx b = xx sum = 00 parity = 0
Reset is asserted BLOCK 2
@3 clk = 1 rst = 1 a = xx b = xx sum = 00 parity = 0
@4 clk = 0 rst = 1 a = xx b = xx sum = 00 parity = 0
Reset is asserted BLOCK 2
@5 clk = 1 rst = 1 a = xx b = xx sum = 00 parity = 0
@6 clk = 0 rst = 0 a = xx b = xx sum = 00 parity = 0
@7 clk = 1 rst = 0 a = xx b = xx sum = xx parity = x
@8 clk = 0 rst = 0 a = 01 b = xx sum = xx parity = x
@9 clk = 1 rst = 0 a = 01 b = xx sum = xx parity = x
@10 clk = 0 rst = 0 a = 01 b = 01 sum = xx parity = x
@11 clk = 1 rst = 0 a = 01 b = 01 sum = 02 parity = 1
@12 clk = 0 rst = 0 a = 0a b = 01 sum = 02 parity = 1
@13 clk = 1 rst = 0 a = 0a b = 01 sum = 0b parity = 1

Both Quartus Prime and ModelSim-Intel support SystemVerilog-2005. However, Quartus Prime's compiler doesn't appear to support clock-edge gating (the "iff" conditional) even though it's legal SystemVerilog-2005. I have set the settings of both compilers to SystemVerilog and I cannot find any other applicable settings.

Please advise. Thank you!