Hi, Forgive me if the question is basic. I am new to the field of FPGAs. I give a short version of the question. And a long version of the question. For those interested :). Note: Requirement is Rx only. No Tx. Half the problem doesn't exist. All pins discussed below are with reference to input pins. :) Short version: CML and LVDS are two high-speed differential signaling standards. FGPA Development Kit 1 has pins on a port supporting CML differential I/O according to the kit reference manual. The actual FPGA on the Development Kit supports LVDS on those pins according to the FPGA manual. But the reference manual of the Dev Kit doesn't indicate support of LVDS on that port. Is it possible to configure the actual pins of the FPGA to take an LVDS input instead of CML. Long version: Altera Stratix V DSP Development Kit. (Supports CML and LVDS on PortA) connected to Altera Stratix III Development Kit. (Supports LVDS only) Basically we want more LVDS lines on the Stratix V to receive input from the DE3 on a wider bus between the FPGAs. So looking for additional pins. Port A of the KIT has CML Rx receivers that could be configured as LVDS on the FPGA. Port B of the KIT has some differential DQS compatible pins that could be configured as LVDS on the FPGA. In both cases, the reference manual of the kit does not indicate that the pins on the port are compatible to LVDS. The FPGA itself supports LVDS input according to the device handbook. The connecter and cable between the boards will be based around Samtec EPLSP A possible work around would be AC coupling between CML/LVDS Using an IC by TI sn65cml100 I'd like some guidance on going about such a task and whether its possible or not? Cheers. Thanks for reading till here. - Zubair p.s. I can't post real hyperlinks cause I just joined the forum. I had links pasted in at every statement pointing to pdfs ..

General comments to help you (not specific to the Stratix V kit). LVDS channels and transceiver channels are not interchangeable, so you have to describe your application in a little more detail. Here's some caveats/typical use-cases. LVDS channels can operate up to 1Gbps (or so). A multi-channel LVDS interface can consist of multiple data lanes, along with a frame clock. The frame clock is used as a PLL reference, with the PLL increasing the frame clock to the data rate. Depending on the data rate, the clock will be used for single-data-rate or double-data-rate clocking of I/O element registers, or clocking of serializer registers. A SerDes channel is a stand-alone entity, with the receivers employing clock-and-data-recovery (CDR). If the common-mode voltage of your signal is different than the common-mode of the receiver, then you need to AC couple the signal (you'd have to check whether the LVDS common-mode was in the acceptable range for the Stratix V receivers). Because of the AC coupling, your input data stream needs to be modulated to ensure a zero DC bias, eg., 8/10B encoding, or PRBS modulation. Multi-channel SerDes applications rely on synchronization/alignment codes being sent across the stand-alone channels, so they are not 'synchronous' (each lane needs its own clock-domain crossing FIFO). You can configure a SerDes channel in a pseudo-synchronous mode, where the receiver PLL is held in lock-to-reference (rather than being allowed to transition to lock-to-data), however, this only works for low frequencies. In this mode, for a mutli-lane application, you would still need to send synchronization codes to align the lanes. If your LVDS data data rate is synchronous and 'not too high', you may want to consider using external LVDS-to-LVCMOS level translators. National Semiconductor (now owned by Texas Instruments) have some 9-bit parts that operated to ~100Mbps http://www.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/ds92lv090a.pdf Check out the "LVDS Owners Manual" http://www.ti.com/lit/ml/snla187/snla187.pdf Cheers, Dave

Hi, Thanks for the informative reply. I understand your reference regarding SERDES requiring frame clocks for synchronization and the PLL. But what if the frame clock is embedded in the signal itself using a unique pattern. And the data is encoded for DC balancing.. If I AC couple the LVDS transmitters from the DE3 board to CML Receivers of the Stratix V board, embed a clock signal in the data stream and encode the data for DC balancing, I should be able to transfer the data right? - Zubair

--- Quote Start --- But what if the frame clock is embedded in the signal itself using a unique pattern. And the data is encoded for DC balancing.. --- Quote End --- Then you can AC couple the LVDS signal to the CML SERDES receiver. You can then use the hard-IP in basic mode, and use it to search for the synchronization patterns. For example, I use the Stratix IV GX/GT transceivers in basic mode, and send data XOR modulated by a PRBS pattern across an AC-coupled link. Before sending data, I just send the PRBS pattern, and first synchronize lanes to that pattern. I then turn on data and demodulate in the receiving FPGA. The data is disabled periodically to check that the PRBS generators in the TX and RX are still synchronized. 8/10B encoding is nicer, in that its always 'checking'. Note that the transmitter and receiver should use a common clock reference. The receiver SERDES uses that reference during power-on-initialization, and then will transition to lock-to-data mode (where the data is captured at an optimal location relative to the data eye). The CDR clock and the reference will be 'phase locked', but the phase can change over process-variation-temperature (PVT). The hard-IP FIFOs can be used to cross from the CDR clock domain over to the clock reference domain (or the PLL locked to the clock reference). Cheers, Dave

Thank-you. AC-coupling seems to be the way to go. I see various strategies. Mostly involving two capacitors. Some indicate a couple of resisters as well. SN65CML100 by TI is also there. I am guessing the speed limits in such a design would be the limitations of the transceivers on the LVDS side. My application requires upwards of 1Gbps. Preferably close to the LVDS limit of the DE3 (1.6Gbps) The hard-IP transceiver block on the Stratix V in basic mode shouldn't be a choking point at these speeds? Also, 8/10B introduces a 25% overhead. It should be possible to opt for 64/66B encoding? Sorry for the petty questions. I can clearly see that I need more practical experience on the FPGA than simply musing over it a-lot and thinking over a bigger design. But I'm learning as it comes. Just don't want to spend time trying to do something impossible :) Thank-you, Zubair

--- Quote Start --- AC-coupling seems to be the way to go. I see various strategies. Mostly involving two capacitors. Some indicate a couple of resisters as well. SN65CML100 by TI is also there. --- Quote End --- At 1.6Gbps a couple of 100nF capacitors should be fine. --- Quote Start --- I am guessing the speed limits in such a design would be the limitations of the transceivers on the LVDS side. My application requires upwards of 1Gbps. Preferably close to the LVDS limit of the DE3 (1.6Gbps) --- Quote End --- Yes, the limit will be the LVDS. --- Quote Start --- The hard-IP transceiver block on the Stratix V in basic mode shouldn't be a choking point at these speeds? --- Quote End --- Worst-case, you may find that 1.6Gbps is too slow (but probably not). If that is the case, then configure the transceiver block receivers and CDR PLLs for 2x or 4x oversampling, and just throw-away the 'extra' bits inside the FPGA. You can also use the 'extra' bits for error checking, eg., in 2x over-sampling mode, confirm that each pair of bits is identical. --- Quote Start --- Also, 8/10B introduces a 25% overhead. It should be possible to opt for 64/66B encoding? --- Quote End --- Or PRBS modulation, which introduces no over-head, but does assume a certain level of randomness in your data. Here's a document plus code that generates PRBS patterns: http://www.ovro.caltech.edu/~dwh/correlator/pdf/lfsr_tutorial.pdf http://www.ovro.caltech.edu/~dwh/correlator/pdf/lfsr_tutorial_src.zip --- Quote Start --- Sorry for the petty questions. I can clearly see that I need more practical experience on the FPGA than simply musing over it a-lot and thinking over a bigger design. But I'm learning as it comes. Just don't want to spend time trying to do something impossible :) --- Quote End --- No need to apologize. Asking intelligent questions that show you've thought about the problem will generally result in useful responses :) Cheers, Dave

Using CML or DQS transceiver pins as LVDS possible in Stratix V DSP Dev Kit?

21 Replies

Altera_Forum
Honored Contributor
13 years ago
--- Quote Start ---

The DE3 setup already exists. Along with a version of the custom ADC Front-end daughter cards.

--- Quote End ---

Ok. I just wanted to throw a couple of ideas out there to see if they were useful.

--- Quote Start ---

Currently, we are upgrading the capability of the entire setup by adding a Stratix V behind 2 DE3s.

Hopefully, in the next iteration, we'll have ADC's with the JEDEC standard. And we'll be able to directly connect a lot of ADCs with one FPGA kit.
Indeed, that would simplify stuff a lot :).

--- Quote End ---

Given that the ADC data is multiplexed onto a pair of lanes, I suspect there will be enough transitions that you could interface a single lane to the CDR unit of a transceiver. However, I think you'd encounter a lot of problems trying to 'recover' your 6-bits of data out of that data stream, since the frame clock you would use for an LVDS application would not really be available for the transceiver channel (keep in mind that each receiver CDR PLL will have an arbitrary phase shift relative to any of the LVDS receive channels or any PLL locked to the frame clock).

My advice would be to steer clear of the transceiver channels for ADC interfacing. However, you could consider them as communications interfaces for transferring ADC data between boards. For example, ADC-to-DE3 interface via LVDS, and then DE3-to-Stratix V data transport using transceivers (and possibly Stratix V to Stratix V transport via transceivers if needed).

Cheers,
Dave
Altera_Forum
Honored Contributor
13 years ago
It was actually wonderful of you to throw some ideas. Throughout our brainstorming sessions, none of us found out about the upcoming JEDEC standard..

Thanks for the heads up. Embedding the frame clock within the signal could be tricky in that case.

Lets hope the IC manufacturers handle these issues. The main benefit of using ADCs designed for a specific purpose is this.
They cater the common configurations and problems faced in that specifc application within the IC. Like the phase shifts you mention.
Vendors usually cater for common clocks and daisy chain configurations of IC's which ensures (to a reasonable extent of accuracy) the phase margins between the signals.

AD9671, an 8-channel ADC for Ultrasound applications is coming soon.
The preview page shows :
"the ADC contains several features designed to maximize flexibility and minimize system cost, such as a programmable clock, data alignment, and programmable digital test pattern generation. The digital test patterns include built-in fixed patterns, built-in pseudo random patterns, and custom user-defined test patterns entered via the serial port interface."

The DE3(Stratix III) does not have any transceivers. Would have simplified a lot of things if it did..

Thanks,
Zubair
Altera_Forum
Honored Contributor
13 years ago
--- Quote Start ---
It was actually wonderful of you to throw some ideas. Throughout our brainstorming sessions, none of us found out about the upcoming JEDEC standard..

--- Quote End ---

Glad to hear that it helped.

--- Quote Start ---

Thanks for the heads up. Embedding the frame clock within the signal could be tricky in that case.

--- Quote End ---

Yeah, I think it would be more trouble than its worth at this point.

--- Quote Start ---

AD9671, an 8-channel ADC for Ultrasound applications is coming soon.
The preview page shows :
"the ADC contains several features designed to maximize flexibility and minimize system cost, such as a programmable clock, data alignment, and programmable digital test pattern generation. The digital test patterns include built-in fixed patterns, built-in pseudo random patterns, and custom user-defined test patterns entered via the serial port interface."

--- Quote End ---

Alas, you often find a better part out there, or proposed ... usually after it is too late for the current project :)

--- Quote Start ---

The DE3(Stratix III) does not have any transceivers. Would have simplified a lot of things if it did..

--- Quote End ---

Why not obtain a couple of DE4's then, or perhaps Stratix IV GX Development kits? The University Program might have an affordable option.

You'll need to tradeoff how much effort it'll take to get data from the DE3 to the Stratix V. You might find its easier to use the HSMC connectors on the Stratix IV kit to get ADC data into the FPGA, and then use the transceivers on the PCIe edge connector to get over to the Stratix V. Samtec have PCIe edge-connector to SMA breakout cables (I have some). I can give you the part numbers if you need them.

Cheers,
Dave
Altera_Forum
Honored Contributor
13 years ago
The DE4/Stratix IV Dev kit only have 38 or 36 LVDS pairs. You gain transceivers but loose ADC channels per board.

Also, we already have DE3 boards with us. :)

"Alas, you often find a better part out there, or proposed ... usually after it is too late for the current project "
Indeed! After the project, you always have a dozen ideas on how to do it better. Next time :p

Thanks,
Zubair
Altera_Forum
Honored Contributor
13 years ago
--- Quote Start ---
The DE4/Stratix IV Dev kit only have 38 or 36 LVDS pairs. You gain transceivers but loose ADC channels per board.

--- Quote End ---

Yeah, I see; clk+17-bits RX per HSMC.

I guess the DE3 has a couple of extra HSMC connectors you can use.

--- Quote Start ---

Also, we already have DE3 boards with us. :)

--- Quote End ---

Having hardware in-hand always helps push the decision making :)

Good luck with your project. Feel free to ping me anytime you feel the need for a discussion.

Cheers,
Dave
Altera_Forum
Honored Contributor
13 years ago
--- Quote Start ---
Yeah, I see; clk+17-bits RX per HSMC.

I guess the DE3 has a couple of extra HSMC connectors you can use.

Having hardware in-hand always helps push the decision making :)

Good luck with your project. Feel free to ping me anytime you feel the need for a discussion.

--- Quote End ---

Indeed.

I'll try not to bother with small stuff :).

Thanks a lot for the help.

Regards
Zubair
Altera_Forum
Honored Contributor
13 years ago
--- Quote Start ---
My advice would be to steer clear of the transceiver channels for ADC interfacing. However, you could consider them as communications interfaces for transferring ADC data between boards. For example, ADC-to-DE3 interface via LVDS, and then DE3-to-Stratix V data transport using transceivers (and possibly Stratix V to Stratix V transport via transceivers if needed).

--- Quote End ---

Hi Dave,

I stumbled upon this thread as I'm currently working on a project using a Stratix IV GX device for the first time (EP4SGX70HF35) while interfacing with 16-bit ADCs. My dilemma right now is trying to figure out the best way to get the data into the FPGA. What's the main reason you advised staying away from the transceivers when interfacing with the ADCs? If I am using the transceivers, do I need to use the ALTGX megafunction in order to get data in/out or can I treat them like regular I/O pins?

Thanks. You seem quite knowledgeable.

-Mike
Altera_Forum
Honored Contributor
13 years ago
I believe he meant that aligning samples from the ADC could pose a problem with transceivers.

If your requirement is such that samples from each channel of the ADC have to be in sync, then it might pose a problem knowing which sample was which.
This shouldn't be much of a problem if there are only 3 ADC channels. The case I was discussing had 96 channels :)
Although, only he can properly answer your question. This was my understanding of it.

I guess it would also depend on the ADC in question.. Which part are you using?

Hope this helps.

-
Zubair
Altera_Forum
Honored Contributor
13 years ago
--- Quote Start ---
I believe he meant that aligning samples from the ADC could pose a problem with transceivers.

If your requirement is such that samples from each channel of the ADC have to be in sync, then it might pose a problem knowing which sample was which.
This shouldn't be much of a problem if there are only 3 ADC channels. The case I was discussing had 96 channels :)
Although, only he can properly answer your question. This was my understanding of it.

I guess it would also depend on the ADC in question.. Which part are you using?

Hope this helps.

-
Zubair
--- Quote End ---

Thanks Zubair,

I started a new thread for this since my reply to this thread was getting hung up in the approval process. Dave answered my question in the other thread.

I have a lot of channels too (16 x 3 ADCs) that I need to get into the FPGA so the transceivers do not seem like the right solution. I'm using the AD9650.

-Mike
Altera_Forum
Honored Contributor
13 years ago
Ok.
Great :)

-
Zubair

Forum Discussion

Using CML or DQS transceiver pins as LVDS possible in Stratix V DSP Dev Kit?

21 Replies

Recent Discussions

Cyclone V GT Dev Kit - new units fail to boot from FPP

DK-DEV-AGI027RES Install Package

DK-DEV-AGI027RBES missing device selection

Why 390.625MHz clock to F-Tile Reference fequency

SyncE clock as the reference for DDR, HBM, and FPGA control interfaces in the Agilex M-Series design