Forum Discussion
VHDL Parser Access Violation on 64-bit decimal literals
I have a VHDL-2008 file with the following line:
constant TxFreqHz : std_logic_vector(63 downto 0) := 64d"3200000000"; -- 3.2 GHz
This results in the following crash:
Problem Details Error: *** Fatal Error: Access Violation at 00007FFF1A603E14 Module: quartus_map.exe Stack Trace: 0x1a3e13: vhdllex + 0x2413 (synth_vrfx) 0x1c2e9c: vhdlparse + 0x20c (synth_vrfx) 0x19b530: vhdl_file::Analyze + 0xd0 (synth_vrfx) 0x63efd: VRFX_ANALYZER_IMPL::verific_vhdl_analyzer + 0x3d (synth_vrfx) 0x5f430: VRFX_ANALYZER_IMPL::vhdl_analyzer + 0x350 (synth_vrfx) 0x5dc62: VRFX_ANALYZER_IMPL::analyze + 0xf2 (synth_vrfx) 0x72a54: SGN_ANALYZER::analyze + 0x1c4 (synth_sgn) 0x7cf7a: SGN_ANALYZER::start + 0x71a (synth_sgn) 0x12375: sgn_qic_full + 0x165 (synth_sgn) 0x42e0: qsyn_execute_sgn + 0x140 (quartus_map) 0x133e6: QSYN_FRAMEWORK::execute_core + 0x136 (quartus_map) 0x12cc6: QSYN_FRAMEWORK::execute + 0x476 (quartus_map) 0x11524: qexe_do_normal + 0x1d4 (comp_qexe) 0x16630: qexe_run + 0x3a0 (comp_qexe) 0x17641: qexe_standard_main + 0xc1 (comp_qexe) 0x1b208: qsyn_main + 0x558 (quartus_map) 0x13538: msg_main_thread + 0x18 (CCL_MSG) 0x1484e: msg_thread_wrapper + 0x6e (CCL_MSG) 0x18210: mem_thread_wrapper + 0x70 (ccl_mem) 0x12cf1: msg_exe_main + 0xa1 (CCL_MSG) 0x2a408: __scrt_common_main_seh + 0x11c (quartus_map) 0x126ac: BaseThreadInitThunk + 0x1c (KERNEL32) 0x5aa67: RtlUserThreadStart + 0x27 (ntdll) End-trace Executable: quartus Comment: None System Information Platform: windows64 OS name: Windows 10 OS version: 10.0 Quartus Prime Information Address bits: 64 Version: 22.1std.0 Build: 915 Edition: Standard Edition
By changing the base to hexadecimal, everything is happy again:
constant TxFreqHz : std_logic_vector(63 downto 0) := 64x"BEBC2000"; -- 3.2 GHz
Please could you fix the bug in your compiler?
Thanks,
Regards,
John-Philip
4 Replies
- SyafieqS
Super Contributor
Hi Bryn,
Seem to me like a bug in the compiler. Can you pass a small design that replicate the issue?
I can forward this to the developer to take a look.
- jpt13653903
New Contributor
Good day,
My apologies -- for some reason only the moderator reply got through to me as an email.
Anyway -- attached is a minimal example that generates the access violation.
Regards,
John-Philip
- SyafieqS
Super Contributor
Let me know if there is any update from previous reply
- SyafieqS
Super Contributor
Hi Bryn,
Thanks for the design. I am able to replicate the issue. I have forwarded the issue to developer to have for a fix.
Thank you for you massive efforts and feedback.
I now transition this thread to community support. If you have a new question, Please login to https://supporttickets.intel.com/, view details of the desire request, and post a feed/response within the next 15 days to allow me to continue to support you. After 15 days, this thread will be transitioned to community support. The community users will be able to help you on your follow-up questions.
p/s: If any answer from community or Intel support are helpful, please feel free to mark as solution, give Kudos and rate 5/5 survey