Forum Discussion

BrianSune_Froum's avatar
BrianSune_Froum
Icon for Contributor rankContributor
2 months ago
Solved

Cyclone IV drop in replacement confirmations

Dear Altera, If the BANK VCCIO is 1.8V and the same package but with different LE # FPGA is drop in replace. Where the original pin is a VCCA while different LE size same pin is a IO. With 1.8V on...
  • AqidAyman_Altera's avatar
    AqidAyman_Altera
    5 days ago

    Hi Brian,

     

    Agree on the long-term point. Bench power-up alone does not prove lifetime stress. The goal is to stay inside the documented connection / reservation rules, not only “it boots today.”

     

    Q: Need more clarification on this: tri-state w/o pull-up or?

     

    A: Yes. On the density where that ball is GPIO:

    1. In Quartus, reserve that pin specifically as "As inputs that are tri-stated" (no weak pull-up, no bus-hold). In the .pin file that shows up as RESERVED_INPUT.
    2. On the board, hard-tie it to 2.5 V (same net as VCCA for the density that needs that ball as power). Per AN 592 / unused-pin guidelines: RESERVED_INPUT may be connected to a high or low on the board.
    3. So, external hard-tie to 2.5 V + FPGA pin = input tri-stated, no pull-up. Not floating tri-state.

    The Quartus migration + RESERVED_INPUT (tri-state, no pull-up) + hard-tie to 2.5 V guidance follows Altera’s published migration and unused-pin connection rules. It is the supported way to keep the pinout legal across densities. It is not a guarantee of long-term electrical behavior for a continuous 2.5 V level on a GPIO that sits in a 1.8 V (VCCIO) bank (for example with SSTL-18 / HSTL-18 on that bank). Absolute VI ≤ 3.6 V and a successful board bring-up do not by themselves prove lifetime margin.