Forum Discussion
4 Replies
- Altera_Forum
Honored Contributor
Different pins drive different clocks in different regions. See figure 4-1 here:
https://www.altera.com/content/dam/altera-www/global/en_us/pdfs/literature/hb/cyclone-v/cv_5v2.pdf Then, skip to Figure 4-18 in the same document to see how different pins connect to different PLL's. Altera provides a design guide: https://www.altera.com/content/dam/altera-www/global/en_us/pdfs/literature/an/an662.pdf The section "Clock Planning" on page 26 says: --- Quote Start --- Understand your device’s available clock resources and correspondingly plan the design clocking scheme. Consider your requirements for timing performance, and how much logic is driven by a particular clock --- Quote End --- Which is a fancy way of saying: for your application, maybe you don't care at all about the differences between the clock pins. Or maybe you care A LOT! - Altera_Forum
Honored Contributor
sorry , I still don't understand what is the difference
- Altera_Forum
Honored Contributor
The difference between the pins is they connect to different set of clock resources.
If you don't care which clock resource you are connecting to, then you don't care about the differences between the pins. The topic can be either extremely important (critical) or it can be "don't care" for many applications. - Altera_Forum
Honored Contributor
Lets say that I need a free running clock source from external pin. but all general clocks are taken.
Can I use FPLL_TL_FBp ?? what are the performance difference? Do you have an example where FPLL_TL_FBp can't be used?