Forum Discussion

Avichay's avatar
Avichay
Icon for New Contributor rankNew Contributor
3 years ago

Agilex F tile the FGT Xcievers REFCLK

Hi, We use on the Agilex F tile the FGT Xcievers with AC coupling.

Intel Agilex datasheet below requires differential p-p voltage of 1.2V. please see attachment .

In the eval board we saw that the XCVRS refclk is driven by AC coupled ,LVDS with 430mv p-p typ please see attachment of the devkit clock clock generator .

Is it possible to use LVDS as REFCLK for XCVRS or needed LVPECL ?

attached is the intel Agilex datasheet

Thanks

9 Replies

  • AqidAyman_Altera's avatar
    AqidAyman_Altera
    Icon for Regular Contributor rankRegular Contributor

    Hi,


    LVDS and LVPECL both should be good to use as REFCLK for XCVRS. Can you clarify to me where did you see the XCVRS refclk is driven by AC coupled ,LVDS with 430mv p-p type in the eval board? Is it in the Agilex datasheet?


    Regards,

    Aqid


  • Avichay's avatar
    Avichay
    Icon for New Contributor rankNew Contributor

    Hi Aqid,

    Thanks for your reply.

    I saw it on the Agillex eval board . its driven with LVDS (at least the note says) with 350mV Swing. (please see previous attachments and attached sheet 38) ,

    however the Intel datasheet requires Vrefin diff-AC of 1.2V . please see previous attachments .

    I am attaching the evaluation board schematic of the Agillex F- Tile.

    please look at sheet 38 for example : REFCLK_156M_QSFPDD_P ,N output of the Silicon labs clock driver.

    Thanks

  • AqidAyman_Altera's avatar
    AqidAyman_Altera
    Icon for Regular Contributor rankRegular Contributor

    Hi,


    Yes, if you follow the evaluation board schematic, you may use LVDS for the F-Tile device.

    II may need your clarification on where did you get the screenshot of the 'evaluation si clk gen lvds png.png' file that you have shared?


    Regards,

    Aqid


  • AqidAyman_Altera's avatar
    AqidAyman_Altera
    Icon for Regular Contributor rankRegular Contributor

    Hi,


    From what I understand, voltage swing is specified as single-ended mVpp while in the Agilex Datasheet it shows the Vdiff AC as Vpp-diff.


    Vpp_diff = 2*Vpp_se


    So, based on the LVDS in the Silicon labs datasheet, it shows 430mVpp_se typ. If we calculated according to the formula above, we got 860mVpp-diff which are still in the range of specification stated in Agilex datasheet.


    Regards,

    Aqid


  • Avichay's avatar
    Avichay
    Icon for New Contributor rankNew Contributor

    Hi Aqid, Thanks .

    thanks i saw that too . the SI datasheet was somewhat confusing as it seemed to be with respect to the common 1.2V

    i assume common mode is diff 1.2V .

    so it should interface ok with LVDS driver like the Intel Agillex eval board

    Thanks,

  • Avichay's avatar
    Avichay
    Icon for New Contributor rankNew Contributor

    still it seems on the low side of the limits . though the SI chip adjusted to higher

  • AqidAyman_Altera's avatar
    AqidAyman_Altera
    Icon for Regular Contributor rankRegular Contributor

    Hi,


    Yes, what would I say is that you can follow the connection as shown in the Intel Agilex eval board to use LVDS as REFCLK for the XCVRS.


    Regards,

    Aqid


  • AqidAyman_Altera's avatar
    AqidAyman_Altera
    Icon for Regular Contributor rankRegular Contributor

    As the answer have provided in the previous reply, I will close this ticket. Please login to ‘https://supporttickets.intel.com’, view details of the desire request, and post a feed/response within the next 15 days to allow me to continue to support you. After 15 days, this thread will be transitioned to community support. The community users will be able to help you on your follow-up questions.