Forum Discussion
Why does Cyclone 10 LP FPGAs not have a fast and warm corner in the multi-corner timing analysis in Quartus?
- 6 years ago
Does this mean, that the Intel FPGA engineers have determined, that the multi-corner timing analysis is reliable without the fast and warm (85C) corner?
Yup, that is correct. If you pull out the cyclone IV. It does not have fast and warn (85C) corner as well.
Or do we have to wait for modelling of the fast and warm (85C) corner before we can do final timing sign-off on and thereby production release of our design in a Cyclone 10 LP?
You do not need to wait for it as even old device like Cyclone IV does not have this.
Does this mean, that the Intel FPGA engineers have determined, that the multi-corner timing analysis is reliable without the fast and warm (85C) corner?
Yup, that is correct. If you pull out the cyclone IV. It does not have fast and warn (85C) corner as well.
Or do we have to wait for modelling of the fast and warm (85C) corner before we can do final timing sign-off on and thereby production release of our design in a Cyclone 10 LP?
You do not need to wait for it as even old device like Cyclone IV does not have this.