Forum Discussion
11 Replies
- Altera_Forum
Honored Contributor
I don't know, but you could create it an measure. either in simulation or in implementation.
- Altera_Forum
Honored Contributor
actually i dont have quartus software. I have xilinx ISE Design Suite. So i want to know about this before switching to Quartus II
- Altera_Forum
Honored Contributor
Are you using a Xilinx Chip? or are you moving to altera chips?
Either way - you can just generate a divider core with a pipeline that should be configurable. You could set the number of clocks to 1 if you like. But usually, with 1 clock pipeline, the fmax would be so slow that you'll actually be able to compute values quicker with larger pipeline length. - Altera_Forum
Honored Contributor
You can also simulate your design in Modelsim Altera Starter edition which is free to check on the clock cycle.
- Altera_Forum
Honored Contributor
if you have 16 bit width number and do division we assume you use the most fast division in most cases it is shift operation only.
After shifting you can correct your result according to remainder. - Altera_Forum
Honored Contributor
but for 16 bit its taking 16 clock cycle
- Altera_Forum
Honored Contributor
that number of clocks it takes should be a parameter of the divider core when you generated the core.
- Altera_Forum
Honored Contributor
is there any other way for division operation in minimum number of cycle?
- Altera_Forum
Honored Contributor
Yes- generate a new divider core.
- Altera_Forum
Honored Contributor
Sir, can you explain it please?