How do I avoid using a specific LAB or ALM in Quartus Prime?

Question

For example, I don't want to use a LAB named "LABCELL_X66_Y55_N6".
How do I let Quartus Prime know this, and avoid using this LAB in compiling my design?
Thank you.

sstrell · Answer

I'm not sure why you don't want to use a particular resource, but you can force logic into resources you do want to use with Logic Lock regions in the Chip Planner.  Draw shapes (rectangular by default; merge them together to make non-rectangular shapes) and assign logic from your design to a region.  Then the Fitter is forced to place the logic in that region.
Be aware that if you have a very full design, this could cause no-fit or timing issues due to you forcing logic into specific locations, away from where the Fitter would prefer to place it.

littlerice32 · Answer

Hi sstrell:
   Thanks for your reply, but it's not the answer what I approach for.
   I want to forbid Quartus Prime to use a particular resource, because I find some particular LAB delay is 10x larger than a normal LAB in Timing Analyzer. After I use chip planner for post-netlist ECO to change the LAB resource to a adjacent LAB, the problem is solved. So, I think the 10x delay LAB may be something wrong.
   I appreciate it if you could kindly provide a solution for my request.

sstrell · Answer

I don't understand how a particular LAB could be slower than any other.  They are identical.  Can you share your .sdc and the timing report where you're seeing this?  There is some reason why the Fitter is selecting this LAB for you (super full design perhaps?) and causing the issue.  The extra delay may be getting a signal to a particular physical location, not the physical resource itself.  If that's the case, you need to figure out why the Fitter is doing this.
The ECO fixes it, but it might be useful going forward to understand the cause of the issue.

littlerice32 · Answer

Hi Sstrell:
  I don't understand that either, but it happens.
  I provide the Chip Planner layout and Timing report here.
  The utilization of my design is 27%, and I think it's not an issue for FPGA fitter.
  BTW, if you know how to avoid using a specific LAB in Quartus Prime, please tell me how. Thank you.

sstrell · Answer

As I suspected, IC is interconnect delay where you're seeing the problem, not LAB (cell) delay.  For some reason, the Fitter is using long routing wires which doesn't make sense as you say since they're in the same LAB.
When you run Report Timing in the Timing Analyzer, turn on the Show Routing option.  That breaks down IC delay into RE (routing element) delay.
There must be some physical reason why the Fitter is doing this.  Again, it would also be useful to see your timing constraints, at least what speed you're trying to run this at.

Forum Discussion

How do I avoid using a specific LAB or ALM in Quartus Prime?

10 Replies

Recent Discussions

Timing analysis - long combinational path

QuartusPro 25.3 Crashed after using the Signal Tap Logic Analyzer

Duplicate_hierarchy_depth / duplicate_register

Automatically added negative node for TDS output doesn't work with Agilex 5

Quartus 20.1std compilation fails for Quartus map - Device 10AS057K2F40I1SG