Forum Discussion
FvM
Super Contributor
2 years agoDon't understand why you rely on using MAX V for the project. It has no on-chip RAM and can't implement Signaltap.
There's a principle option to implement hardware TCP/IP stack in FPGA (probably needing more logic cells than provided by MAX V), but it's not supported by any Intel IP.
A processor-less remote debug interface can be easier implemented through other fast serial links.
There's a principle option to implement hardware TCP/IP stack in FPGA (probably needing more logic cells than provided by MAX V), but it's not supported by any Intel IP.
A processor-less remote debug interface can be easier implemented through other fast serial links.
Peter01
New Contributor
2 years agoHi Frank,
I can replace MAX V with MAX10.
*************
There's a principle option to implement hardware TCP/IP stack in FPGA (probably needing more logic cells than provided by MAX V), but it's not supported by any Intel IP.
I have planned this initially but dropped due to complexity.
*************
A processor-less remote debug interface can be easier implemented through other fast serial links.
This exactly suits my application . Could you provide suggestion to remote debug (signaltap) .
I am aware of using JTAGD (Linux JTAG server) on x86 platform and using USB blaster. But this doesn't fit in my requirement.
A hint on use of SLD hub controller for remote debug would be appreciated.
Thank you.