Forum Discussion
12 Replies
- Altera_Forum
Honored Contributor
There are probably no synchronized reset paths that originate in the CLKA domain but reset registers in the CLKB domain…which is most likely a good thing :-) I would guess there are 720 setup (data) paths between these domains.
- Altera_Forum
Honored Contributor
Are you sure you're looking at Recovery Paths? RR usually means Rising to Rising transfers, which would show up in setup/hold analysis.
- Altera_Forum
Honored Contributor
I don't think that my system has 720 RR paths from CLKA to CLKB, but timequest reports that. So I just to confirm whose are these paths, but it tells me no recovery paths found as well as removal paths, setup paths and hold paths.
- Altera_Forum
Honored Contributor
I can't do much more without the design(perhaps some screenshots, but not sure if that will show what's going on or not.) I would trust the report_timing reports more than the Clock Transfer reports, but you may want to file an SR or something if you don't get to the bottom of it.
- Altera_Forum
Honored Contributor
The screenshots shows below, hope it could help:
http://blogimg.chinaunix.net/blog/upfile2/080114111512.jpg - Altera_Forum
Honored Contributor
You just have a single report_timing with the -recovery option shown. What happens if you run the same command(up arrow) and change this to -setup?
- Altera_Forum
Honored Contributor
Yes, if change it to -setup, it will report setup paths timing.
But I am confused that TimeQuest report there exist 720 recovery path but not setup paths. - Altera_Forum
Honored Contributor
Yeah, I missed that it was a Recovery Transfer report. Strange. You probably want to file an SR, as it doesn't make sense to me. (You could try making an .sdc file without any set_false_path or set_clock_group assignmnets and run the same commands with that. Maybe the Clock Transfers report is looking at false paths while the report_timing definitely does not.)
- Altera_Forum
Honored Contributor
Yeah, you are correct.
set_false_path is the root reason. Sorry for the stupid question. Thanks! - Altera_Forum
Honored Contributor
That still seems odd. As you can see in your screenshot, even false-path transfers get listed. They just have "false path" instead of a number in the table.