Now with increased FPGA/FPSoC applications like AI, compute acceleration, RF and more, doesn't that warrant a redesign of the entire software suite?
I’d like to further understand your concerns. Could you please share more details about the pain points you’re experiencing when using Quartus, as well as your expectations on how the software should be redesigned to better support FPGA/FPSoC applications?
I am also of the opinion that the three separate ways that Quartus is shipped might be stifling time and resource allocation into developing one software tool that works for all devices.
I assume the three versions you're referring to are Quartus Pro, Standard, and Lite. We previously discussed the possibility of consolidating these into a single software package that supports all devices. However, due to resource constraints, that idea was rejected, and it's unlikely we will see a unified Quartus software in the near future.
Additionally, the underlying tools used in the Pro version differ from those in the Standard/Lite versions. Integrating them into a single package could introduce potential bugs and compatibility issues. It would also significantly increase the disk space required for installation, which could be a concern for some customers who only use one device family and do not need the full software suite.
Regards,
Richard Tan
Occasional Contributor
.png){kind=link}