usleep() accurate ?

Hello Soin,

I tried the /s, but did not help much....until i figured I was simulating in "debug" mode

instead of the "release" mode. Last sim in "release" mode this time with /s showed relatively

good accuracy: ask 3-> got 4.3, 12->13.75 and 50 -> 50.85. I will try with the /e...

I also tried in the meantime with the alt_timestamp() family of functions which would have been an avenue

to create my own my_usleep() function, but since a few calls are required each time, they

are not so accurate unless you take into consideration the time for the call to alt_timestamp_start() and

alt_timestamp() to elapse. But in that case, since comparisons are involved, I guess I would have

obtained better result having the data cache with the /f (haven't tried).

Thank you very much for your hints. It helped a lot.

Regards,

Eric