--- Quote Start ---
originally posted by smcnutt@Jan 20 2005, 07:29 PM
hi cetic,
> ... i have read in some threads around here that sdram performances
> were quite bad.
i've found the sdram controller performance to be pretty awful. given
the logic area it occupies and its performance, i no longer consider it a
viable alternative for many new designs.
> sram is a bit expensive if i want to have enough memory to run
> my linux (i guess i need at least 4mb).
i've switched to psram (pseudo sram) for new designs. it eliminates
the sdram controller and it performs better[/b]. The cost is
very attractive ... the expense is the number of pins you must use.
Regards,
--Scott
<div align='right'><{post_snapback}> (index.php?act=findpost&pid=4142)
--- Quote End ---
[/b]
--- Quote End ---
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div>
--- Quote Start ---
I've found the SDRAM controller performance to be pretty awful. Given
the logic area it occupies and its performance, I no longer consider it a
viable alternative for many new designs.[/b]
--- Quote End ---
Is these tru, If so, how much slower will it be. Frequeny