Honored Contributor
Honored ContributorI see now that the USB blaster appears to be much, almost an order of magnitude, faster than the Ethernet blaster, or the direct USB connection to the NEEK board. This was against a different board than the NEEK, but the above posted delays for the Ethernet blaster are against the same board as the results below. Thats odd. Why would the Ethernet blaster be ten times slower than the USB blaster. This is odd considering that the speeds observed are much lower than full throughput on either link type (so presumably the Ethernet blaster is the limiting factor).
Loading section .text.entry, size 0x20 lma 0x1000 Loading section .text.except, size 0xf0 lma 0x1040 Loading section .text, size 0x7dce4 lma 0x8000000 Loading section .rodata, size 0x7f34 lma 0x807dce4 Loading section .rwdata, size 0x20dc lma 0x8085c20 Start address 0x1000, load size 556548 Transfer rate: 111 KB/sec, 398 bytes/write. These tests were run on Ubuntu Linux.
