Forum Discussion
Hi,
Yes, I can see the same problem in v20.1, and will feedback to the Intel FPGA FFT IP engineering team.
For the moment, you may increase the inter-packet gap number to work around the issue. For example, you can change the IPG_number to 256 in your testbench.
Regards -SK
I have the exact same issue implementing the FFT with a cyclone V with quartus lite. Although for my implementation i need to pause the FFT stream between packets for 144 clk cycles only. Hence, the solution provided here won't help me.
- User15821927331502095 years ago
Occasional Contributor
Hi tessellation,
thanks for your reply.
I have tried 2 another solution to solve IPG issue for now, both of them not perfect.
solution 1
install 2 FFT core in parallel and switch input packets to 2 fft core alternately, by such arrangement you will not see any IPG issue, IPG can be 0. cost is FFT resource doubled.
solution 2
change output order to digit reverse, then you will not see IPG issue, but cost is you need other logic to do re-order work.
best regard
Jim
- tessellation5 years ago
New Contributor
Thanks Jim, very helpful