Forum Discussion

Panau's avatar
Panau
Icon for New Contributor rankNew Contributor
1 year ago

D5005 DSP Count

Hi, I'm looking at the following page:

https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/products/sku/193921/intel-fpga-pac-d5005/specifications.html

On this page, it's stated that a D5005 has 2800000 LEs, 244 Mb on-chip memory and 11520 DSP blocks. Under Essentials, is says that the D5005 is using the Stratix 10 GX FPGA, while under Package Specifications it says that the D5005 was formerly known PAC with Intel Stratix 10 SX FPGA. As far as I understand, SX and GX are almost identical (SX is the SoC version).

Looking at the specifications of the SX (https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/ark/products/series/141550/intel-stratix-10-sx-soc-fpga.html) and GX (https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/ark/products/series/141548/intel-stratix-10-gx-fpga.html), on both pages there is a product listed with 2753000 LEs and 5760 DSPs. While the number of LEs ist just a small difference, I'm wondering why there are 11520 DSPs listed for the D5005 while the FPGAs just have 5760 DSPs.

Could you clean up my confusion regarding the DSP count?

6 Replies

  • Panau's avatar
    Panau
    Icon for New Contributor rankNew Contributor

    Hi, Thank you very much for your reply.

    Will the information on the website be changed?

    Does the D5005 use the GX 2800 (non SoC) or the SX 2800 (SoC) version of the FPGA or are there different D5005s out there?

    I noticed that the "View now" link under Package Specifications -> Datasheet is broken.

  • JohnT_Altera's avatar
    JohnT_Altera
    Icon for Regular Contributor rankRegular Contributor

    Hi,


    The D5005 is using SX device and not GX device.


  • JohnT_Altera's avatar
    JohnT_Altera
    Icon for Regular Contributor rankRegular Contributor

    Hi,


    May I know if you have any other queries?


    Thanks


  • Panau's avatar
    Panau
    Icon for New Contributor rankNew Contributor

    HI,

    I have no further questions, I just would like to see precise information on Intel websites that do not contradict each other.

    Let's see what the Altera website will look like, I'm afraid a lot of information will be lost.