Hi, I'm building the analog front end for my software defined radio receiver architecture. The ADC will directly sample the bandwidth of interest to basband where the the information can be passed into the FPGA for demodulation. I am currently searching for an FPGA for my SDR application. I am wondering if anyone has any advise on FPGA development kits that could be tethered to my analog front end. I'm considering the BeRadio dev kit from Arrow which uses the Cyclone 4. I was thinking about connecting my analog front end to the 80 pin connector on the SDK. Would this be possible? The cyclone 4 looks like it may be the FPGA for my application. However, I am new to FPGA platforms and I would like to know any recommended FPGA development boards that would be suitable for constructing an all-in-one software defined radio development kit. Many thanks in advance. Regards, Les.

Your FPGA selection needs to be based on your ADC selection. For example 1. Logic Interface; 3.3V LVCMOS, LVDS, or transceivers (JESD204)? 2. Interface clock frequency; what is the bus speed into the FPGA? Cheers, Dave

Great! - The ADC I am using is the AD9629-40 from Analog Devices. I believe the output drivers can be configured to interface with 1.8V to 3.3V CMOS logic families. I'll be sampling at 40MSps. I'm very interested in purchasing a software development kit that can connect to my ADC. Can you please suggest Altera's low cost FPGAs and devlopment kits that would fit the AD9629-40? Kind regards, Les.

--- Quote Start --- The ADC I am using is the AD9629-40 from Analog Devices. I believe the output drivers can be configured to interface with 1.8V to 3.3V CMOS logic families. I'll be sampling at 40MSps. --- Quote End --- Yes, according to the data sheet, the output data can be operated at 3.3V logic levels. 40MHz is relatively slow, so any FPGA can be used. I'd recommend a Cyclone series device. --- Quote Start --- I'm very interested in purchasing a software development kit that can connect to my ADC. Can you please suggest Altera's low cost FPGAs and devlopment kits that would fit the AD9629-40? --- Quote End --- Are you planning on creating a PCB or do you have the evaluation board? http://wiki.analog.com/resources/eval/ad9266-80ebz_ad9649-80ebz_ad9629-80ebz_ad9609-80ebz Cheers, Dave

I appreciate your help - Yes, I have got the ADC evaluation board for the AD9629-40 as well as the High Speed Data Capture Kit (the exact set up from the link you sent). Do you know if it's possilbe to code the Virtex 4 on the High Speed Data Capture Kit for radio applications? I am building the analog front end and the ADC onto a PCB as a prototype for product manufacturing. Initailly, my plan is to build the PCB and replace the ADC evaluation board, so it can connect to the High Speed Data Capture Kit for further evaluation using SPI controller and VisualAnalog. Then replace the High Speed Data Capture Kit with an FPGA board to develop my code in software. Does Altera have FPGA boards that can connect to the AD9629-40 ADC evaluation board ? Thanks again, Les.

--- Quote Start --- Yes, I have got the ADC evaluation board for the AD9629-40 as well as the High Speed Data Capture Kit (the exact set up from the link you sent). Do you know if it's possilbe to code the Virtex 4 on the High Speed Data Capture Kit for radio applications? --- Quote End --- Its your board, you can do anything you like. Since the board has a Virtex device on it, this is the wrong group to ask questions. You'll need to have a subscription edition of Xilinx's ISE tool to be able to create configurations for the FPGA. --- Quote Start --- I am building the analog front end and the ADC onto a PCB as a prototype for product manufacturing. Initailly, my plan is to build the PCB and replace the ADC evaluation board, so it can connect to the High Speed Data Capture Kit for further evaluation using SPI controller and VisualAnalog. Then replace the High Speed Data Capture Kit with an FPGA board to develop my code in software. Does Altera have FPGA boards that can connect to the AD9629-40 ADC evaluation board ? --- Quote End --- Analog Devices have various adapter kits for their boards, start by looking on their site, or filing a service request there. I'd recommend designing your board to use a standard interface, eg., HSMC if you want to use it only with Altera devices, or FMC if you want to be more general. Although given that the ADC data rate is only 40MHz, you could also just design it to work with the 100-mil expansion headers found on various Altera kits. If you're designing the board for your own use, or for interfacing to your own various interface boards, then just select a connector that allows you to plug your boards together. Once you've decided on what your final connector style will be, you can create an adapter board to interface to the Analog Devices evaluation board. You could easily create an adapter board to interface that ADC kit to any of the Altera FPGA kits too. Cheers, Dave

An all-in-one Software Defined Radio platform

16 Replies

Altera_Forum
Honored Contributor
12 years ago
Thank for the great notes on DSP in FPGAs. That is of great use for me.

Yes! that is a good example of the type of the SDR kit I am after. However, I am not sure if the Arria V is the right FPGA for my system.

Currently, I am searching for an FPGA suitable for the project/product. I am creating a table of the possible FPGAs, weighing up the differences. Hopefully, this will lead me to more definite decisions on the kit I'll purchase.

Cheers,
Les.
Altera_Forum
Honored Contributor
12 years ago
Hi Les,

--- Quote Start ---
Thank for the great notes on DSP in FPGAs. That is of great use for me.

--- Quote End ---

You're welcome.

--- Quote Start ---

Yes! that is a good example of the type of the SDR kit I am after. However, I am not sure if the Arria V is the right FPGA for my system.

Currently, I am searching for an FPGA suitable for the project/product. I am creating a table of the possible FPGAs, weighing up the differences. Hopefully, this will lead me to more definite decisions on the kit I'll purchase.

--- Quote End ---

If you really are interested in "software" defined radio, then you would not even need to use an FPGA :)

That being said, having an FPGA to interface to ADCs/DACs, and to off-load "software" if you need to, is very useful. Why not consider an Altera SoC device; you can run Linux on the ARM core, and then as much "software" of the SDR as possible, while offloading to the FPGA whatever needs to be done in hard-real-time.

Cheers,
Dave
Altera_Forum
Honored Contributor
12 years ago
This just keeps getting better! A SoC device may be just what I am looking for.

The device I am redesigning currently uses a two chip solution -an IC used for GMSK (9600bps) demodulation and data handling, it does High-level data control (HDLC) and Non-return-to-zero inverted (NRZI) decoding. And an ARM7 microcontroller is used as a host micro. I'm new to SoC devices, but could it be possible to replace all this with a SoC device - doing digital down conversion and signal processing algorithms in the FPGA, effectively replacing the current IC. Then use the ARM core as the host micro... Am I on the right track?

Cheers,
Les.
Altera_Forum
Honored Contributor
12 years ago
--- Quote Start ---

I'm new to SoC devices, but could it be possible to replace all this with a SoC device - doing digital down conversion and signal processing algorithms in the FPGA, effectively replacing the current IC. Then use the ARM core as the host micro... Am I on the right track?

--- Quote End ---

Yes, an SoC device plus the external ADC could replace what you have now, but so could;

1) An FPGA with a soft-core processor.

2) An FPGA connected to a "real" processor.

The advantage of the SoC though is that it has a "real" processor in the same package as the FPGA, so you have ample resources to connect the two, and much more processing horse-power than the NIOS II soft-core processor.

Given the choice between the ARM processor and the NIOS II, I'd go for the ARM. That being said, the SoC devices are new, so there is still a lot of teething to be had. Up until now, I have been using (2), as my processing solution, but its a pain, since you often need lots of glue logic to match the processor bus to the FPGA.

Go ahead and have some fun, look at the SoC devices :)

Cheers,
Dave
Altera_Forum
Honored Contributor
12 years ago
Fantastic! I am very keen to have go with a SoC device. I see have the Arria and Cyclone SoC devices. I'll have a look through Altera's resources on this.

Thanks again for your time and help Dave.

Kindest regard,
Les.
Altera_Forum
Honored Contributor
12 years ago
Hi Les,

--- Quote Start ---
Fantastic! I am very keen to have go with a SoC device. I see have the Arria and Cyclone SoC devices. I'll have a look through Altera's resources on this.

--- Quote End ---

Altera have a Cyclone V SoC Kit ($1,595)

http://www.altera.com/products/devkits/altera/kit-cyclone-v-soc.html

and Arrow/Terasic have an SoC Kit

http://www.altera.com/b/arrow-sockit.html
http://www.arrownac.com/solutions/sockit/

The Arrow/Terasic kit is $249
http://parts.arrow.com/item/search/#st=sockit

I'm not sure which is better value, as I have not looked at either.

--- Quote Start ---

Thanks again for your time and help Dave.

--- Quote End ---

You're welcome.

Cheers,
Dave

Forum Discussion

An all-in-one Software Defined Radio platform

16 Replies

Recent Discussions

Avalon-ST configuration with Agilex 3 fails

JTAG Chain Broken on Agilex 7-I Dev Kit

Question

Quartus Prime Pro 25.1 fatal error during fitter: Windows "Efficiency mode" required

Will serialization factor of 6 in LVDS serdes IP be supported in the future on Agilex5?