Forum Discussion

Altera_Forum's avatar
Altera_Forum
Icon for Honored Contributor rankHonored Contributor
11 years ago

Helio Vs Altera Soc Vs Arrow kit for Cyclone V evaluation

Hello

I need to work with cyclone v soc for evaluating its multi-core performance.

I am planning to buy an Evaluation kit.

Based on resources and support available which one would help me jump start?

1) Macnica - Helio Board

2) Arrow - SoCKIT

3) Altera - Cyclone V SoC Development Kit

Pls share your views

Lnk

3 Replies

  • Altera_Forum's avatar
    Altera_Forum
    Icon for Honored Contributor rankHonored Contributor

    I went with the SoCKIT. It was cheaper than the Altera board which had stuff on it I don't need. There is more support for SoCKit than the Helio, but not as much as the Altera board. I might have chosen the new DE1-SoC board if it was available when I purchased the SoCKit.

  • Altera_Forum's avatar
    Altera_Forum
    Icon for Honored Contributor rankHonored Contributor

    Thanks for the response.

    I got the Helio board due to immediate availability with our local vendor. As you pointed, there are more resources for Altera board than Helio board.

    I am facing portability issues with Altera board's sample projects when used for Helio board.

    I understand the Preloader (Hardware config + pin out, GPIO numbers etc) changes.

    In general, what else do I need to consider when using sample projects between different boards.

    Regards

    LnK
  • Altera_Forum's avatar
    Altera_Forum
    Icon for Honored Contributor rankHonored Contributor

    I don't know of a listing of the differences between the various dev boards out there. In general, if you are porting an example to a different dev board, you need to make sure the I/O is compatible. For example that voltage levels match, outputs on the FPGA aren't connected to outputs on the board, etc. I'd start by comparing each line in the example project's I/O constraints file with the schematic of your board.