Forum Discussion

JOHI's avatar
JOHI
Icon for Contributor rankContributor
7 years ago
Solved

DE10-Standard & DE10-nano both fail at 88% download of EPCS128.

Hello,

The title is clear, this post is to share experience with the community.

I will answer it myself.

Best Regards,

Johi

  • Hi Johi, So in summary, selecting the incorrect flash devices is the root cause to the programming failure. Also, we can change TCK frequency to 6MHz for more stable programming experience. Thank You. Regards, YL

5 Replies

  • JOHI's avatar
    JOHI
    Icon for Contributor rankContributor

    Hello,

    As it turns out, after some searching, there is no EPCS128 but EPCS64 installed on the print.

    The manuals of DE10-NANO & DE10-Standard both refer to EPCS128, replacing EPCS128 with EPCS64 fixes the problem.

    Best Regards,

    Johi.

  • JOHI's avatar
    JOHI
    Icon for Contributor rankContributor

    Correction: DE10-Standard has effectively EPCS128 why but the remark about My nano remains valid: EPCS64 and not EPCS128.

    Why the download of the DE10-Standard failed at 88 % is still unclear.

    Best Regards,

    Johi

  • YuanLi_S_Intel's avatar
    YuanLi_S_Intel
    Icon for Regular Contributor rankRegular Contributor
    Hi John, I am confused. So is the issue being solved? Thank You. Regards, YL
  • JOHI's avatar
    JOHI
    Icon for Contributor rankContributor

    Hello Yl,

    Yes issues were resolved:

    for the DE10-nano: it is solved (configure EPCS128->EPCS64)

    for the DE10-standard​ all of a sudden, download succeeded.

    Thank you for asking.

    Best regards,

    Johi

  • YuanLi_S_Intel's avatar
    YuanLi_S_Intel
    Icon for Regular Contributor rankRegular Contributor
    Hi Johi, So in summary, selecting the incorrect flash devices is the root cause to the programming failure. Also, we can change TCK frequency to 6MHz for more stable programming experience. Thank You. Regards, YL