Forum Discussion
JOHI
Contributor
ContributorDE10-Standard & DE10-nano both fail at 88% download of EPCS128.
Hello, The title is clear, this post is to share experience with the community. I will answer it myself. Best Regards, Johi
- Hi Johi, So in summary, selecting the incorrect flash devices is the root cause to the programming failure. Also, we can change TCK frequency to 6MHz for more stable programming experience. Thank You. Regards, YL
JOHIContributor
ContributorCorrection: DE10-Standard has effectively EPCS128 why but the remark about My nano remains valid: EPCS64 and not EPCS128.
Why the download of the DE10-Standard failed at 88 % is still unclear.
Best Regards,
Johi
