Forum Discussion

Altera_Forum's avatar
Altera_Forum
Icon for Honored Contributor rankHonored Contributor
11 years ago

Conduit(s)?

Hi, today I'm asking myself: Why do I need to use different conduits e.g. "conduit_end_0", "conduit_end_1", etc.? Or can I declare all my own signals with the same "conduit_end"? Or isn't there any d...
Altera_Forum's avatar
Altera_Forum
Icon for Honored Contributor rankHonored Contributor
11 years ago

Hi Dave! Awesome explanation!!!

I started already reading about the _hw.tcl, as I received this recommendation already. Writing my own?? I think this is still a bit too... but I'm getting there to understand it better, I think. So, I understand the naming of the conduits is really up to me, how I like to group my signals, e.g. a SPI group, and an I2C group, i.e. in my easy example, read/write which is all the same data conversation would be fine in the same conduit, anyway it doesn't make a practical difference to use plenty of conduit names. Great! Thx!