Forum Discussion
Altera_Forum
Honored Contributor
17 years agoThanks gee for response.
I take the picture of my test file: 1) bmp file: the chip planner design of the dely time (http://mail.sso.ncku.edu.tw/cgi-bin/owmmbox/openwebmail-webdisk.pl/test.bmp?sessionid=l7697401*-session-0.819223314329101¤tdir=%2f&action=download&selitems=test.bmp)http://140.116.5.200/~e9493122/test.bmp (http://140.116.5.200/%7ee9493122/test.bmp) 2) jpg file: the waveform of the input/output signal in oscilloscope (http://mail.sso.ncku.edu.tw/cgi-bin/owmmbox/openwebmail-webdisk.pl/wave.jpg?sessionid=l7697401*-session-0.819223314329101¤tdir=%2f&action=download&selitems=wave.jpg)http://140.116.5.200/~e9493122/wave.jpg (http://140.116.5.200/%7ee9493122/wave.jpg) in this case, the fan-out connections are: input port to the LE, which is the buffer: 2.074 ns delay time in LE : 0.2 ns LE to the output port : 0.612 ns The estimate total delay time is around 3 ns, but the real total delay time is around 15 ns in scope. You mean I should consider the input/output delay besides the delay time that are shown in chip planner. I cannot find if the chip planner can show the input/output buffer delay as you mentioned. Does it mean that the delay time shown on chip planner is totally not right, or I shoud add extra delay time of the input/output buffer by hand? that is, 3 ns + (input/output delay which cannot be shown) = 15 ns I am wondering that, when the input/output delay is not correct, how can I trust the delay time shown in chip planner of other elements? Thanks for your attention and help.