Forum Discussion
We do not receive any response from you to the previous question/reply/answer that have been provided. This thread will be transitioned to community support. If you have a new question, feel free to open a new thread to get the support from Intel experts. Otherwise, the community users will continue to help you on this thread. Thank you.
Hi AdzimZM and SyafieqS,
I have tried the following command :
if {![is_post_route]} {
set_min_delay -from [get_keepers "memory_ddr4x72_wrapper_a\|u0\|emif_s10_0\|emif_s10_0\|ecc_core\|core\|ecc\|internal_master_wr_data\[*\]*"] -to {memory_ddr4x72_wrapper_a|u0|emif_s10_0|emif_s10_0|arch|arch_inst|io_tiles_wrap_inst|io_tiles_inst|tile_gen[*].lane_gen[*].lane_inst|lane_inst~phy_reg1} 4.114
}
The path with the worst negative slack of my paths had a Data Delay of 3.74. I then added 10% to this value as you told me : 3.74*1.1 = 4.114
The problem is that this made the timing analysis of my design way worse : now I have 500+ of this failing paths in my DDR. (It used to be 30 path only).
Am I doing something wrong?