Forum Discussion
3 Replies
- Altera_Forum
Honored Contributor
In what way do you needs backwards compatability? They wont be pin compatible because of different packages. But unless you have specifically instantiated Cyclone 3 elemements in your code (which most people wont be doing) the code should port across the two chips as easily as just changing the device type (and pin allocations) in a quartus project. No source code changes needed.
- Altera_Forum
Honored Contributor
Thanks for answering!
I want to order an Altera NIK development kit and this is with cyclone IV. This has al the features i need. But the FPGA IV is very exspencive and i dont need the a high speed FPGA. For testing the board is ideal. But if i want to create a own prototype, i maybe want to use a cyclone III. because it's cheaper. This is the reason for my question. - Altera_Forum
Honored Contributor
Cyclone IV should be less expensive than a comparable Cyclone III. Maybe you got the price for a EP4CGX version. These parts are more expensive than a comparable Cylcone III device. You should check the EP4CE devices.