Forum Discussion

milenko121175's avatar
milenko121175
Icon for New Contributor rankNew Contributor
3 years ago

Cyclone 10GX Reference Design - Cyclone10GX_PCIeGen2x4_DMA_18_0 fails during enumeration.

Hello, This post would seem to be near identical to: https://community.intel.com/t5/Programmable-Devices/Intel-pcie-gen-2x4-example-design-with-avlonmm-dma-reference/m-p/1472443 But I have verifie...
Fpga Devkit
hareesh's avatar
hareesh
Icon for Frequent Contributor rankFrequent Contributor
3 years ago

As we do not receive any response from you on the previous question/reply/answer that we have provided. Please login to ‘https://supporttickets.intel.com’, view details of the desire request, and post a feed/response within the next 15 days to allow me to continue to support you. After 15 days, this thread will be transitioned to community support. The community users will be able to help you on your follow-up questions.


  • milenko121175's avatar
    milenko121175
    Icon for New Contributor rankNew Contributor
    3 years ago

    I will most definitely not as accept this as a solution. How is this example project an example of anything else but obsolescence? Do I need to find 6 year old Linux, motherboards, etc as well? What would be the point of me exploring this obsolete project? What would it teach me (other than frustration and Intel's seemingly complete lack of support)?

    Would it be possible to get a contact at Intel to return this development board for a full refund? There is no other PCIe DMA/Linux project. And since Intel's material is not maintained, I'm not sure how I can trust anything else? This link should have said with a big, bold red warning label - OBSOLETE - NOT RECOMMENDED FOR NEW DESIGNS.

    https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/design-example/714945/cyclone-10-gx-pcie-gen2-x4-dma.html

    If anyone else is reading this. Run!