Forum Discussion
Occasional ContributorCyclone 10 GX: The actual JTAG ID is different than was expected
Thank you JohnT,
I unchecked the program/configure box with the .sof, thus the configuration was as follows the Figure.
In sequence, this error was presented to me: Error(209031): Device chain in Chain Description File does not match physical device chain -- expected 1 device(s) but found 2 device(s).
But, I found a similar case in this forum and I managed to solve the problem. The inclusion of a cdf file was enough to programmer the device.
Occasional ContributorDear JohnT,
I realize the auto-detect when I was programmer the board but was necessary inform the device, as you can see in Figure. Even so, the previous settings were maintained, I believe that the problem is not the device selection.
I'm using the Cyclone 10 GX Development Kit and the Intel MAX 10 used to establish the JTAG Chain is the 10M08SAU169, how is illustred in Figure bellow:
My doubt is, to configure the CvP PCIe in this device and then programmable it, the only programming mode is the JTAG? Or I can select the AS or PS, for example.
Another question that I have is about these address codes, you informed me that the JTAG ID code 0x031820DD is referring to the Max 10 (10M08) device. What the code 0x02E120DD is about? Is there any Intel document or manual that explains about these address codes?
Regards.
