Forum Discussion

KimchiPort's avatar
KimchiPort
Icon for New Contributor rankNew Contributor
2 years ago
Solved

Cost effective solution for DisplayPort Rx solution?

Hi everyone, Just wanted to ask for some general ideas about a cost effective solution for prototyping a DisplayPort RX application, mainly just analyzing basic video parameters and possibly storing...
Fpga Devkit
  • ZH_Intel's avatar
    ZH_Intel
    2 years ago

    Hi KimchiPort,

    Apologize for the delayed response.

    For cost effective solution is depends on the customer's application.

    Based on your brief requirements, it seems like cyclone10 device would be sufficient for basic video parameters.

    It has support up to 4k applications.

    You may refer to below link for more information on IP support:

    1. Intel® FPGA Support Resources
    2. Intel DisplayPort IP Support Center

    Hope this answers your question.

    Thank you.

    Best Regards,

    ZH_Intel

ZH_Intel's avatar
ZH_Intel
Icon for Frequent Contributor rankFrequent Contributor
2 years ago

Hi KimchiPort,

Apologize for the delayed response.

For cost effective solution is depends on the customer's application.

Based on your brief requirements, it seems like cyclone10 device would be sufficient for basic video parameters.

It has support up to 4k applications.

You may refer to below link for more information on IP support:

  1. Intel® FPGA Support Resources
  2. Intel DisplayPort IP Support Center

Hope this answers your question.

Thank you.

Best Regards,

ZH_Intel

KimchiPort's avatar
KimchiPort
Icon for New Contributor rankNew Contributor
2 years ago

Hi ZH_Intel,

Thank you for the reply and sharing the links. DisplayPort IP - Device support family also lists Cyclone V. Could you provide more info on why not using Cyclone V?

The example designs does not include Cyclone V. Just thinking how feasible would it be to write the firmware code by myself considering I am very new to fpga programming.

Regards,

KimchiPort