Forum Discussion

Altera_Forum's avatar
Altera_Forum
Icon for Honored Contributor rankHonored Contributor
10 years ago

System Verilog: Overridden members system verilog classes

class my_a;

int member1 = 1;

endclass

class my_ea extends my_a;

int member1 = 2;

endclass

Now when I do

my_a a;

my_ea ea;

ea =new();

a=ea;

================================================== ==========

ea = new(); has given handle to object of type my_ea to class variable EA.

a=ea; This pass the same handle (pointer value which points to object of my_ea) to A. so , A.member1 should refer to value 2.

But it refer to value 1. why?

1 Reply

  • Altera_Forum's avatar
    Altera_Forum
    Icon for Honored Contributor rankHonored Contributor
    10 years ago

    This is because you declared A as class my_a, therefore you only have visibility of variables/functions declared in the my_a class. If you want to see member1 from the my_ea class you will need to cast A to the my_ea class.

    This is important because you can have many sub-classes of my_a, with an array of variables all of different classes. The compiler can only see the class of the variable type, it doesnt know what class it is from the handle.

    This can get a little confusing with virtual/non virtual functions. non-virtual functions will always call the function from the class type of the variable. virtual functions will always call the function from the class declared by the handle, because they get overridden in the base classes.