Forum Discussion
PCIe EP BAR0 size mismatch between Configuration value and FPGA value
- 4 years ago
Hi,
By default the bar0_address_widths are set to 7.
In standalone IP generation steps, The IP instance parameter value is not changing as per selected BAR0 Size.
But when PCIe EndPpoint is generated as part of complete System design along with other components, a component instance Warning showed up sighting the mismatch in instance address width value and component address width value .
Sync-ing both these address widths as per design Arch, fixed the issue.
How can we control instance parameter while generating Standalone IP (Intel L/H Tile Avalon Memory Mapped for PCI Express)?
Regards
Siva Kona
Hi,
The ep_altera_pcie_s10_hip_avmm_bridge_2211 bridge parameters are not getting set as per the configuration in GUI
pcie_g3x8_ep_altera_pcie_s10_hip_avmm_bridge_2211_enrjqki #(
.enable_rx_buffer_limit_ports_hwtcl (1),
.pf0_bar0_address_width_hwtcl (7), // Was set in 36 bits
.pf0_bar0_enable_rxm_burst_hwtcl (1),
.pf0_bar1_address_width_hwtcl (0),
.pf0_bar1_enable_rxm_burst_hwtcl (0),
.pf0_bar2_address_width_hwtcl (0),
.pf0_bar2_enable_rxm_burst_hwtcl (0),
.pf0_bar3_address_width_hwtcl (0),
.pf0_bar3_enable_rxm_burst_hwtcl (0),
.pf0_bar4_address_width_hwtcl (7), // Was set in 9 bits
.pf0_bar4_enable_rxm_burst_hwtcl (0),
.pf0_bar5_address_width_hwtcl (0),
.pf0_bar5_enable_rxm_burst_hwtcl (0),
.pf0_expansion_base_address_register_hwtcl (0),
Need help!
Regards
Siva Kona