--- Quote Start ---
Thanks for the info.
I think i will try it.
Even if I'm a bit scared because the last time passing from the beta to the official release
Nallatech had the idea of changing the name of the board making unusable
binaries that required hundreds of hours of cpu time to build them up.
grazie
--- Quote End ---
Now I'm scared to update definitely BSP.
One first result I got from a precompiled fft1d binary is that it is 30% less performant :
with new BSP R001.004.0002
Using AOCX: fft1d.aocx
Reprogramming device with handle 1
Launching FFT transform for 2000 iterations
FFT kernel initialization is complete.
Processing time = 5.7592ms
Throughput = 1.4224 Gpoints / sec (85.3449 Gflops)
Signal to noise ratio on output sample: 137.677661 --> PASSED
Launching inverse FFT transform for 2000 iterations
Inverse FFT kernel initialization is complete.
Processing time = 5.7347ms
Throughput = 1.4285 Gpoints / sec (85.7101 Gflops)
Signal to noise ratio on output sample: 137.041007 --> PASSED
with old BSP (quartus 16.0.0)
Using AOCX: fft1d.aocx
Launching FFT transform for 2000 iterations
FFT kernel initialization is complete.
Processing time = 4.1108ms
Throughput = 1.9928 Gpoints / sec (119.5692 Gflops)
Signal to noise ratio on output sample: 137.677661 --> PASSED
Launching inverse FFT transform for 2000 iterations
Inverse FFT kernel initialization is complete.
Processing time = 4.0927ms
Throughput = 2.0016 Gpoints / sec (120.0977 Gflops)
Signal to noise ratio on output sample: 137.041007 --> PASSED
Honored Contributor
