Forum Discussion
CheepinC_altera
Regular Contributor
7 years agoHi Samuele,
Thanks for sharing the files and steps to replicate the issue. I have performed some tests on my sides and able to replicate your observation. As you mentioned, seems like when the number of coefficient is (2^x + 1), the number of address bit will be lacking of 1 bit. I have tested with Q18.1 and observe similar behavior. For your information, I have filed a case to Engineering to further look into this and for future fixes.
To avoid gating your progress, as a workaround, I would like to recommend you to avoid using the number of coefficient = (2^x + 1). Sorry for the inconvenience.
Please let me know if there is any concern. Thank you.
Best regards,
Chee Pin