Forum Discussion
Thanks @sstrell for detailed clarification.
Regarding of "Quartus Automatic Adding the internal bridge" vs "Customer defines the defined bridge", how could we compare and evaluate their performance difference, to decide which one to be used ? Do you have any idea ?
Thanks a lot
Hi Sir,
From performance perspective, usually without the bridge is the best because the latency is decrease. The bridge is add for some other purpose like both master-slave clock use different clock domain, multiple master to single slave or vice versa. You may refer to the description of the bridge as explain in this document, all bridge added is for some purpose.
https://www.intel.com/content/dam/www/programmable/us/en/pdfs/literature/hb/nios2/edh_ed51007.pdf