Forum Discussion
Altera_Forum
Honored Contributor
12 years agoYeah, I know keeping things synchronous is better but like I said earlier, it'd reduce my overall performance at the cost of (potentially) increased noise due to the higher frequency and it's only for this one signal. With regards to the hold time, I meant data and address hold time at the end of write ( tHD, tHA). Most of ISSI's memories list this as 0ns (S64WV6416DBLL/DBLS for instance, page 14). Unless I'm on crack, of course..:)
Either way, what's your preferred way to generate a write signal? Half the frequency and clock it on falling edges or divide by 4 and use positive edges? -Mux