Forum Discussion
Altera_Forum
Honored Contributor
12 years ago --- Quote Start --- I found Your paper ( cpci_power_on_timing.pdf ), that calculates total configuration time for EP4CGX15. --- Quote End --- Here's the more complete version of it; http://www.ovro.caltech.edu/~dwh/wbsddc/ts4_power.pdf --- Quote Start --- Here is a quote from it: the configuration time for a cyclone iv gx ep4cgx15 configured via fast passive
parallel (fpp) mode using a 66mhz clock is; 3ms power-supply ramp + 9ms power-onreset
delay + 3,805,568-bits/66mhz = 70ms. Of course FPP is not applicable to EP4CGX15, but the calculation is also misleading... Please explain why did You interpret Table 1–4. Recommended Operating Conditions for Cyclone IV GX Devices (Part 2 of 2) in such a way: "3ms power-supply ramp + 9ms power-onreset delay"? --- Quote End --- Hmm, let me try to remember ... :) The first error I notice is that I said FPP, but the calculation is for PS mode (since there is no divide-by-8). The 3ms power-on-ramp comes from the hardware design, eg., see p18 of the PDF I just linked to, so that is design-specific, but it is what you must implement when you select MSEL for Fast POR, i.e., tRAMP < 3ms. The 9ms POR delay is what the "reset supervisor" delay inside the FPGA implements, and worst-case it is 9ms. Sorry, I missed including that delay in the posting earlier in the day. So your power-on time calculation is tRAMP + tPOR + tCFG, where tCFG is the bit-stream configuration time. In reality, if you are conservative and target tCFG < 50ms, all the other small time values do not matter. If for example you use FPP mode, then the configuration time is a small fraction of the 100ms requirement, so its no problem ... until of course you use a large Stratix V device ... but then you can use CvP. Cheers, Dave