Forum Discussion
Altera_Forum
Honored Contributor
13 years ago --- Quote Start --- If the configuration consistency is checked, I would expect MAX II staying in unconfigured state (all pins tri-stated with weak pull-up), otherwise it might show arbitrary erroneous behaviour. Did you remember the behaviour in this single evident? --- Quote End --- For me, the MAX was not in HZ state with weak pull-up (as it is during configuration by Blaster), because some of its IOs driving LED or ON/OFF of board power supplies were in relevant state. But the configuration of the FPGA by the MAX PFL was failing, even after OFF/ON of the board. Usually, the external CFI FLASH containing FPGA firmware pages is corrupted, but in this case the only way to recover was to reconfigure the CPLD CFM. --- Quote Start --- Regarding FPGAs, at least Cyclone III documentation seems to indicate there is some kind of error checking during configuration but again the details aren't included. --- Quote End --- You could find some intersting litterature about SEU mitigation in this ALTERA documents : http://www.altera.com/literature/wp/wp-01135-stxv-seu-mitigation.pdf http://www.altera.com/literature/wp/wp-01135-stxv-seu-mitigation.pdf you could also find more docs on the ALTERA website with the "SEU mitigation" search keywords ;-)