Forum Discussion
Altera_Forum
Honored Contributor
8 years agoThanks. The catalog says 60nm and the webpage says 65nm - less important to worry about the discrepancy.
Whether it is 60nm or 65nm, still do not understand how 50% power reduction is claimed compared to the 28nm Cyclone V in the picture on page 2 of the catalog. Also I do not understand MAX10 offering 50% board size reduction especially the user flash being very small in size and the boot segment can be replaced by a QSPI chip which is < 3mmx3mm. On a related note, is Cyclone 10 SoC in pipeline?