ContributionsMost RecentMost LikesSolutionsRe: Next gen processor FS90, right direction? Then keep it to FPGA"s then and I would not have to answer your own questions lol I was kind of looking for others... Soon in a header file not far away. .. _Win_64, _OSX, _Linux, _Android... _Posix, _ANSI _DECIMAL._64, _FRACTIONAL_64 I will give it a go, use one of the memory serial channels for one core and expand in to graphics once I have a command prompt and is confible. Re: Next gen processor FS90, right direction? Not really a silly discussion, 100 times faster and I would be seeing rainfall with puddle reflections in my games. It's wrong to hardcode and decimal math is a form of hardcode format. Is it a way cogs really turn? You could say a fraction of or a distance, eithway fraction math may work and be faster than decimal math? There's probably a Paper out there... Re: Next gen processor FS90, right direction? Yes though 10-100 times faster is a noticeable thing. It's a choice I guess though converting a lot would result in a rounding issue. Popular may be popular. Also have to look at practical advantages, half way along an edge is just simple, so is scaling so 100 pillars on a building is just x = n * (buildingwidth/pillarcount.) is something we already do. Not sure what PI equals to as a fraction to 64 bit places. Re: Next gen processor FS90, right direction? You are correct, a base 10 number system stored in base 2. I'm calling for a base 10 sizeing with base 2, stored in a base 2. It's closer to the metal. It's about fractional math not decimal math on the metal. Re: Next gen processor FS90, right direction? OK, let's look at an engineering pont over view, cm, mm vs inches and fractions of. Computers work in base 2, so does 1/2 inch, 1/4, 1/8 1/16, 1/32, 1/64, 1/128 & 1/256. Whilst mm goes in dividing by 10 or base 10, also 0.5 or 1/2cm, or 500/1000, 1000/10000, 2000/10000, it all goes strange when using computer maths. My point is fractional math is faster, less steps involved in calculating the answer hence is faster. Serial based math computing is easy! I think we need to move away from base 10 in as far as human & computer interaction is concerned and work with whichever is faster as computers are very fast nowdays and translating from and to human form is only necessary in print commands when a person needs to read or input its value. Let's work in base 2 systems. I'm wearing a "Base 2" t-shirt! Let's store as w.f.o whole.fraction.of or fraction.of like 123/32 Next gen processor FS90, right direction?OK I'm proposing my new design, the FS90 Processor. Current CPU, GPU's a lot of components. OK here's the story, I would like a serial based fractional math based processor as fractional math is simpler and faster than decimal math and a serial based processor would be made of less components. So heres the answer, if you rotate a memory data table 90 deg in memory you can have simultaneus single bit serial data access (64 channels using 64 bit memory) using standard memory, great for graphics. Add in an arithmetic matrix to the memory, and some command ROM and a complete computer may be possible. My FS90 Processor, Fractional Serial (rotated memory by 90 deg) fs90processor.com So, any thoughts?