Forum Discussion
Altera_Forum
Honored Contributor
15 years ago --- Quote Start --- Is it correct or not? --- Quote End --- It's a specification. Semantically, it's incorrect, because the number 100 is written under "Maximum" cycles, so strictly spoken, no minimum is guaranteed. I would however expect a typical number of reprogamming cycles of 1000 or more. Practically, an issue could arise with development or prototype boards, because a production board won't be reprogrammed more frequently than a few ten times. With MAX V, the UFM part of the flash memory has got a 1000 cycles specification for the commercial grade.